If there's no ring, is it fair game?
If there's no ring, is it fair game?
Well. If it's my SO I would suggest you didn't.
Signature by rubah. I think.
Well I don't think you should really only consider ones that don't have rings on it as fair game. Even those with rings on it are to be looked at too.
I mean,
is pretty but it needs love too!
That depends on whether or not you're a whore.
Bow before the mighty Javoo!
I would smurf the god damn curly feet right off Frodo Baggins and I don't give a damn who knows it.
I dunno, I guess it depends. If they are in a relationship, and they have been together for a long time... Uh. Well... You know how that might go. <. <
To be fair, a ring is just a ring. I know a lot of people wear rings on their 'marriage' finger without being married and I know a lot of people who are married don't wear rings.If a person is open to advances, then so be it. If they are in a happy, committed relationship then leave them alone. If you keep advancing, yeah, you're scum. There are plenty of people in the world and if one is taken that isn't to say that there are no other people out there that will make you happy. Find another.
Bow before the mighty Javoo!
I wonder how many couples have gotten married just because Beyoncé told them to.
They're all fair game, it just depends on whether or not they're willing to play.![]()
Wow. Scumbag JuliRiv appears.
Signature by rubah. I think.
Someone go Photoshop Scumbag Steve's hat on my head.
>TALK
>>Talk to whom?
>HOTGUY
>He responds, "Yo."
>>How do you reply?
>"I WANT U"
>He responds, "But I'm taken."
>>How do you reply?
>"I DUN CARE"
>He responds, "I have a wife."
>>How do you reply?
>"I DUN CARE"
>He responds, "I have a ring."
>How do you respond?
>ACTION
>>What do you want to do?
>ITEM
>>What item?
>RING
>>Remove?
>Y
>>How do you respond?
>"NO MORE RING"
Problem solved.