I'm sorry, but all that translates to me is "it's okay for a man to want breasts and a puss because other men would otherwise know they are flirting with a man".Originally Posted by WildRaubtier
WELL ACTUALLY your view of transgenderism is incredibly flawed. You're assigning a genetic marker as the end all be all tell tale sign of gender when in fact it an individuals inherent DIRECTION that determines their gender!
That makes absolutely no sense.your goddamn FACE contradicted itself like seven times in this post, sucker
What I demonstrate is clear thinking and not being some leg propping up liberal extremities where facts don't matter.I think that by narrowing down everything to only two possible scenarios, you demonstare that you're the one with the irrational mindsetSo if one thinks critically, what really are the reasons for transgenderism? There are only two possible things:
1. A person does not like the role of their natural gender, in which has nothing to do with sexuality.
2. A person wants to trick a heterosexual person. In which case, this is deception and is driven by some irrational mindset.
That type of pretentious nonsense has no place in my book.
I'm sorry, but all that translated to was "if people weren't bigoted, a man finding out they have been seeing another man would be perfectly fine".Trickery? If it weren't for the bigots, whom you may or may not be one, no trickery would be needed! everyone could be what they felt they are, without the gender police beating them senseless (s'not cool to beat up a girl unless they're only a transgendered girl)
