I find it ironic and somewhat sad that an article written about intelligence is so poorly written.

The only actual numbers given involve a rather limited age grouping which is too small to be worthwhile.

Generally, I find these kinds of articles to be kind of silly. The kinds of correlations being produced involve many more variables than are taken into account without providing the reader with a better context or more substantial numbers.

Not really even contending the validity of the findings, just don't find the information very intelligible or useful.

Really all it boils down to is that smart people are smarter than not smart people and that smart people have ideas that are different from everyone else. Well, yeah, that's the idea isn't it?

I did like the tidbit about the nocturnal/intelligence relationship, b/c I'm a night-owl. =)