I don't like them in any way, don't get me wrong (those three you mentioned in particular) but they haven't been challenging us for the title so the hatred has kind of just... gone. I used to detest Chelsea because they were wankers that would beat us, and there is nothing worse than being beaten to titles by a bunch of absolute wankers. With their unbeaten runs under Jose, it kind of all got emphasised and I really, really didn't like them. What's worse than Terry/Cole/Lampard? Terry/Cole/Lampard/Robben/Drogba beating you to Premier League titles, that's what. Seriously hated those guys so much.
These days I just don't like them, and that's about it. They're wankers, but not wankers that beat us to trophies on a regular basis. There was that one CL success recently, and I really really really wanted Terry to not get his medal or to be allowed on the pitch, but somehow he managed to act like it was all him anyway. Urgh. Pillock.
Try as I might to hate City, I just don't hate them... well, not yet, anyway. So that leaves me with no team I hate, and that's just boring. City don't have those specific players that you can't stand watching win - perhaps Tevez could be seen as the exception to that for me (Barry/Milner at a push). But I have a lot of respect for Aguero, Silva, Yaya Toure and Kompany, for example. If they got Suarez at City, I might get towards hating them. >=P
Anyway, the reason Jose would make me hate Chelsea again is because he'd probably have them winning trophies again. I like Jose, but I don't have to like his teams or the fact that they win.




