View Poll Results: Which version of FFIV is best?

Voters
32. You may not vote on this poll
  • "Final Fantasy 2" on SNES

    3 9.38%
  • Final Fantasy IV on Super Famicom

    2 6.25%
  • Final Fantasy IV EG Version on Super Famicom

    0 0%
  • Final Fantasy IV on PSX

    6 18.75%
  • Final Fantasy IV Advance on GBA

    5 15.63%
  • Final Fantasy IV DS

    8 25.00%
  • Final Fantasy IV on PSP

    8 25.00%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 29 of 29

Thread: Which version of FFIV is the best?

  1. #16
    Elskidor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    The Land of Nevermore
    Posts
    1,370

    Default

    It's been a few years, but I remember liking the DS version a lot, but it seemed easier than the original. I don't know if there is any truth to it, or maybe I just remember IV being harder when it first came out. I have only played the SNES, PS and DS versions so far.

  2. #17
    Not responsible for WWI Citizen Bleys's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    The Wired
    Posts
    8,502
    Articles
    7
    Blog Entries
    60

    FFXIV Character

    Bleys Maynard (Sargatanas)
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    PSP version all the way; it's the only way to get The After Years without becoming a Wiitard.
    Last edited by Citizen Bleys; 08-19-2012 at 08:17 PM.

  3. #18
    she'll steal your heart Hollycat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Strawberry Pocky
    Posts
    9,343
    Articles
    2
    Blog Entries
    129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Citizen Bleys View Post
    DS version all the way; it's the only way to get The After Years without becoming a Wiitard.
    You mean psp don't you?
    This post brought to you by the power of boobs. Dear lord them boobs. Amen

  4. #19
    Not responsible for WWI Citizen Bleys's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    The Wired
    Posts
    8,502
    Articles
    7
    Blog Entries
    60

    FFXIV Character

    Bleys Maynard (Sargatanas)
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    That's what I said. *ninja vanish*

  5. #20
    Nerf This~ Laddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Memphis, TN
    Posts
    11,884
    Articles
    5
    Blog Entries
    10

    Default

    I've beat it on PSX and GBA, yet only tried it on DS and never touched the PSP version, but I say GBA since the ever-so-slightly improved visuals and better writing is certainly a plus.



  6. #21

    Default

    The GBA PAL/Second japanese release is the best version of this game in existence. We all know how dreadful the US/first JP release is. Literally unplayable. As for the other ones:

    -"FF2": JRPG for babies.
    -FF4 on SFC: Can't play that with a reliable script if you're not fluent in Japanese, and I am not. Plus it lacks the bonus content of later versions.
    -Easy Type: let's be real, no one plays that.
    -PS1: Seriously, those load times. No bonus content either.
    -DS: Nothing bad I can say about this one (though I don't have it), but it's not called a remake for nothing. Compared to the original, it's another game entirely.
    -PSP (Complete): I'm sorry, but being able to multi-cast Protect or Shell the same way you do Float is seriously broken. Also, it looks a little too good considering the substance.

  7. #22

    Default

    I personally like the GBA Version the best, for staying true to the original while adding more. Having access to practically every character in the end was a really nice addition.

    Though if I ever get to play the PSP version, I'll probably have that one as my favourite for having all the GBA content intact, having the After Years packaged within it, having the nicest graphics, and being able to switch between two different soundtrack versions on the fly.

  8. #23
    Nice about it Nice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    All up in that goodness.
    Posts
    390

    Default

    I've played all versions of FF IV and my favorite version was the psp. The DS version is interesting, but I'm not sure it was my cup of tea. The psp version is more or less a love letter to the fans I feel, plus it comes with Interlude and the After Years.

  9. #24

    Default

    The one they haven't made yet

  10. #25
    Elskidor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    The Land of Nevermore
    Posts
    1,370

    Default

    I still have not gotten around to trying the PSP version. Does the PSP add anything more or better than the DS? Or did the PSP version get so many votes, because it was fresh and new when this poll was first created? The DS kicks ass. Still not sure why the heck square tards have not made new updated versions of VI, but have a zillion different forms of IV, but I guess I'll never understand what these guys are thinking. IV is a great game though, so I guess there is never such a thing as too many different versions.

  11. #26
    Huh? Flower?! What the hell?! Administrator Psychotic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    53,271
    Articles
    71

    Default

    I've beaten the PSone version and the SNES version, which are pretty much identical anyway - load times and FMVs being the difference, I guess. I've started the iOS version and I must say I like it a lot more. I was never a fan of FFIV's sprites (compared to V and certainly VI) although the battle ones are nice. I love the 3D art style, and I think the writing has been sharpened a little bit.

  12. #27

    Default

    The load times on the PS1 can't be that bad can it? I've played Origins and I noticed a couple seconds of waiting between fights in Final Fantasy II. It didn't bother me at all. You notice it at first, but once you get into the groove of the game you barely notice them. Anthology also had a few seconds of loading for battle, but nothing to really complain about. Is Chronicles worse somehow or the same?

  13. #28
    Elskidor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    The Land of Nevermore
    Posts
    1,370

    Default

    I can't recall, but load times on PS1 generally really annoy me, so I don't know if I would get use to it. A couple seconds would not be bad, but PS1 is known for horrid load times. I really like the DS version best so it works for me though. Damn, FFIX PS1 load times...nightmare. It's either 14 or 16 seconds for a fight to load, and when you figuring you'll probably fight a good 1000 to 2000 battles that adds up eating into a good 5 to 9 hours of the overall game time experience, depending on how much you grind. VII and VIII aren't that much better. They may say they run about 55 to 60 hours of game play, but with all that load time you can shave off a good chunk of those hours. That is one thing I love about the classic era. I'd love all PS1 games to be delivered on a system where the load times were all but non existent.

  14. #29

    Default

    Now that I've played the game for a while, I can say that yes, loading a save file and saving the game takes some time, but that's about it. Once you load the game, just use Memo Save as a replacement until you want to quit. Memo Save takes no time at all, and is useful if you're constantly dying. So it's very easy to work around. And even without it, I've played enough Playstation games to not be bothered by loading times. I'm pretty patient in that regard. Heck, I had to learn patience just to play this series!

    I'm very far into the PS version of the game (Sealed Cave) and I'm really enjoying it. Even though it's the only version I played, I went ahead and voted the Playstation version. From what I've researched, it's more true to the original game than any other version. US release on SNES was made easier, while DS took several liberties and harder difficulty. I'm sure they are both great, including the DS, but I usually like to experience games how they were originally made (unless the original was awful). And so, Playstation it is.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •