Bleys, it's not a direct assault with an umbrella. What happens is that they will see you walking towards them, and despite the fact you are under cover, they will move over and lower their umbrella so that it hits you in the head, potentially the face, and then they glare at you as if you were the one who walked into them.
Tangent that may amuse only me: there was an actual question on a US bar exam some years ago (it showed up on a practice question for me) where the correct answer was that person A hitting person B with an umbrella was sufficient provocation so that if B killed A in response, the murder charge would be downgraded to manslaughter.
Moral to the story: come to the US to kill those damn umbrella wielders.
I just had this vision of you casually strolling your vehicle through a Best Buy or something, running over everything in your path without discretion to pick up a single video game. You lean out your window to get it off the shelf like you would at a drive thru window. You then force your vehicle through the check out line and pay for your game. You know, so you're not breaking any laws.
Raistlin that is smurfing brilliant.
Even worse the oblivious slow walking herd of tourists with trolley cases!
Ah, yes. The group of slow walkers. Typically plump, middle aged friends walking side by side.
I actually got that question wrong. I knew the law very well: that what would otherwise be considered murder where there is "sufficient provocation" (generally discovering adultery) is downgraded to manslaughter. But I thought "there is absolutely no way being smacked with an umbrella by a little old lady [oh yes, it was a little old lady in the fact scenario] is sufficient provocation." Apparently those umbrella attacks are much more serious than I thought.
Oh crowded areas how I loathe thee, let me count the ways...
[insert mile long rant]
4444444444 4 4 444 44 4