Anniversary Mafia Game Thread - The Final Day

[[M] Dee]

Hmm. So it's 5-5. Whelp, you guys better come out and play.

[[M] Mom – Host]

Vote tallies are now current, kupo! :mog: Gosh things move fast~

[[M] Mom – Host]

Smurf you Leila Vote counts are now current as of Leila's post. :mog:

[[M] Dee]

I have no issue with taking out a one-voter, but I fail to see why they should be taken out instead of an inactive player.

[[M] Caprica]

Killing a town on Day 1 saves mafia one more night's work. How often does stringing up inactives work out? I'd rather like to see people fighting to see who gets killed Day 1 instead of everyone agreeing on someone who doesn't/can't argue and then not posting.

Anyone want to help me hang Setzer or do I have to pick a more controversial target?

[[M] Elize]

Too many damn players in this game.

My vote is now boring so I will make it interesting.

##Unvote: Biggs
##Vote: Setzer

Voting inactives is ok strategy, but usually the 100% inactives are not scum, just people without time. The true scum are the ones who make 1-3 posts, keeping active but under the radar.

[[M] Elize]

Anyone want to help me hang Setzer or do I have to pick a more controversial target?

I'm on board with you Yuffs. Let's light this place up.

[[M] Felix]

Yuffie, you say that as if we lynching an active member day one actually gives the potential to yield better results. I don't believe it does. What do you have that makes you think Setzer is mafia?

[[M] Dee]

Killing a town on Day 1 saves mafia one more night's work. How often does stringing up inactives work out? I'd rather like to see people fighting to see who gets killed Day 1 instead of everyone agreeing on someone who doesn't/can't argue and then not posting.

Anyone want to help me hang Setzer or do I have to pick a more controversial target?

Looks like it's time to argue.

All I'm saying is that there is little to no point in going after a one-voter for any reason that an inactive wouldn't qualify for.

As for stringing up inactives, it has worked before. I fail to see the whole mafia=active theory that had always existed. If we're going for someone known for relative silence, whether it be a one-voter or an inactive, we shouldn't be reasoning as why one's behavior would be more suspicious.

[[M] Dee]

Voting inactives is ok strategy, but usually the 100% inactives are not scum, just people without time. The true scum are the ones who make 1-3 posts, keeping active but under the radar.

I fail to see how this applies. If someone doesn't have time to play, their allegiance is irrelevant to their inactivity.

[[M] Felix]

##unvote:
##vote: Galuf

Three posts, 1 vote, piled on an inactive. If we're going for someone who at least showed up and hoping people who will not make it will be replaced he is a much better choice than Setzer.

[[M] Harry - Dad's Dad]

Smurf you Leila Vote counts are now current as of Leila's post. :mog:

I'm just too fast for you.

[[M] Ron - Cop Dad]

I'm sorry about the edit, I didn't know. Really really sorry about the picture, I feel embarassed. < trying to find an embarrassed smiley, bugger it. And sorry I've been inactive! I don't have a lot of time today and there's so many new posts, you guys should make a 48 hour day. But I'm done apologizing now and hopefully won't have to anymore!

##vote: Galuf

He was the first person to bandwagon in the game when there were plenty of other inactive to vote for too.

[[M] Dee]

Smurf you Leila Vote counts are now current as of Leila's post. :mog:

I'm just too fast for you.

These innuendos are awesome.

[[M] Ron - Cop Dad]

BAH Serah got there before me. See, not editing!