[QUOTE='[M] Yuffie;3165373']
Quote Originally Posted by [M] Serah View Post
Yuffie, you say that as if we lynching an active member day one actually gives the potential to yield better results. I don't believe it does. What do you have that makes you think Setzer is mafia?
What made you think I think Setzer's mafia? I'm looking around with a spotlight and seeing what it picks up. ;D

Quote Originally Posted by [M] Quistis View Post
Quote Originally Posted by [M] Yuffie View Post
Killing a town on Day 1 saves mafia one more night's work. How often does stringing up inactives work out? I'd rather like to see people fighting to see who gets killed Day 1 instead of everyone agreeing on someone who doesn't/can't argue and then not posting.

Anyone want to help me hang Setzer or do I have to pick a more controversial target?
Looks like it's time to argue.

All I'm saying is that there is little to no point in going after a one-voter for any reason that an inactive wouldn't qualify for.
There's little to judge about inactives and nothing gained in killing all inactives if there is one mafia pretending to be inert. The net loss is too high.

Quote Originally Posted by [M] Quistis View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Laguna
Voting inactives is ok strategy, but usually the 100% inactives are not scum, just people without time. The true scum are the ones who make 1-3 posts, keeping active but under the radar.
I fail to see how this applies. If someone doesn't have time to play, their allegiance is irrelevant to their inactivity.
It does McFly. An inactive town is still one more person for mafia to kill whether they do it at night or not. It doesnt matter if they're here or not but that they need to be dead for mafia to win.
I just assumed you wouldn't so directly contradict yourself Yuffie.