D&D Alignment Test

[NeoCracker]

Værn is our first villain. Get him.

I don't think you want to do that. I've already made a contract with a devil which, of course, will allow him to collect my soul as payment if I am defeated. The only thing you can possibly hope to accomplish by turning against me is the empowerment of a greater evil than myself.

Your move, Mr. Goody-Two-Shoes.

I'll just hire an adventuring party with a Paladin. That smurfer will track your ass through every afterlife.

I'm sure that the baatezu will appreciate having an uninvited paladin on their home plane, just as I am sure that any tanar'ri that the party happens to encounter while passing through Avernus will be equally welcoming.

It's a D&D game, theres going to be a way for the players to bypass at least half of that trout.

[Værn]

Værn is our first villain. Get him.

I don't think you want to do that. I've already made a contract with a devil which, of course, will allow him to collect my soul as payment if I am defeated. The only thing you can possibly hope to accomplish by turning against me is the empowerment of a greater evil than myself.

Your move, Mr. Goody-Two-Shoes.

I'll just hire an adventuring party with a Paladin. That smurfer will track your ass through every afterlife.

I'm sure that the baatezu will appreciate having an uninvited paladin on their home plane, just as I am sure that any tanar'ri that the party happens to encounter while passing through Avernus will be equally welcoming.

It's a D&D game, theres going to be a way for the players to bypass at least half of that trout.

That depends. The good guys aren't necessarily the players. Maybe I'm a player, and you're the DM sending an NPC party to its death.
And besides, there's already a very easy way to get into Hell without devils attacking you. All you need to do is contract yourself to servitude in the Blood War for them. I'm sure that they would gladly let you in under those circumstances.

[Jinx]

Neutral.

Just neutral.

[Raebus]

Chaotic neutral.

[NeoCracker]

Værn is our first villain. Get him.

I don't think you want to do that. I've already made a contract with a devil which, of course, will allow him to collect my soul as payment if I am defeated. The only thing you can possibly hope to accomplish by turning against me is the empowerment of a greater evil than myself.

Your move, Mr. Goody-Two-Shoes.

I'll just hire an adventuring party with a Paladin. That smurfer will track your ass through every afterlife.

I'm sure that the baatezu will appreciate having an uninvited paladin on their home plane, just as I am sure that any tanar'ri that the party happens to encounter while passing through Avernus will be equally welcoming.

It's a D&D game, theres going to be a way for the players to bypass at least half of that trout.

That depends. The good guys aren't necessarily the players. Maybe I'm a player, and you're the DM sending an NPC party to its death.
And besides, there's already a very easy way to get into Hell without devils attacking you. All you need to do is contract yourself to servitude in the Blood War for them. I'm sure that they would gladly let you in under those circumstances.

Well if you are the player there is no way you are getting an army of devils to protect you, evil or not. XD

[Araciel]

True Neutral.

Not surprised.

[Shorty]

Chaotic good! Last time I took it I was neutral good. Something must have changed!

Chaotic Good:
A chaotic good character acts as his conscience directs him with little regard for what others expect of him. He makes his own way, but he’s kind and benevolent. He believes in goodness and right but has little use for laws and regulations. He hates it when people try to intimidate others and tell them what to do. He follows his own moral compass, which, although good, may not agree with that of society. Chaotic good is the best alignment you can be because it combines a good heart with a free spirit.

[Laddy]

Welcome to chaos.

[Shorty]

high five!

[Unbreakable Will]

Neutral
A neutral character does what seems to be a good idea. She doesn’t feel strongly one way or the other when it comes to good vs. evil or law vs. chaos. Most neutrality is a lack of conviction or bias rather than a commitment to neutrality. Such a character thinks of good as better than evil. After all, she would rather have good neighbors and rulers than evil ones. Still, she’s not personally committed to upholding good in any abstract or universal way. Some neutral characters, on the other hand, commit themselves philosophically to neutrality. They see good, evil, law, and chaos as prejudices and dangerous extremes. They advocate the middle way of neutrality as the best, most balanced road in the long run. The common phrase for neutral is "true neutral." Neutral is the best alignment you can be because it means you act naturally, without prejudice or compulsion.

[Red Mage Coffman]

I got chaotic neutral. So... uh, yeah.

[noshowmillk]

Chaotic neutral even though I find myself somehow following the side of chaos and darkness by complete accident. It just happens, but I still try.

[Araciel]

Why do you agree/not agree with what it says?

LAW VS CHAOS
I agree because I generally obey laws that make sense to me (not murdering people) but don't the ones I don't see matter much (jaywalking vs not, or illegally downloading media)

GOOD VS EVIL
I also agree because I don't believe that I am good or evil - and have made good and evil choices regularly, but generally choose an amoral option if there is one.

When I first heard of alignments back in 1992, I thought of myself as Lawful Good. Shortly thereafter, especially after reaching puberty, I realized that was not the case.

[The Man]

I think even most chaotic good people/characters tend to obey laws like "don't murder"

[Araciel]

You've clearly not played D&D.