Also wtf my why did it copy paste what I said in the other quote. Sorry about that.
Also wtf my why did it copy paste what I said in the other quote. Sorry about that.
what xD this doesn't even make any sense. please use a coherent sentence.Hahaha, oh Brucey. If you're scum you're defending Jason.
The thing you can't seem to grasp is that I, in no way, shape or form believe you have any potential to be the cop. You're a liar, and a bad one at that. Lynching Jason is not the easiest thing to do, it's the stupid thing to do. We lose one townie today, potentially one tonight and then have to waste tomorrow's lynch on you while your mafia buddies gleefully giggle to themselves about the free day they get to not be called out.If you're town, you're really dumb. Lynching a potential cop instead of Jason. Here's the easiest thing to do, since it's still early in the game, lynch Jason. You will see if I am lying or not. Or lynch me, and lose a cop and then you'll have no choice but to lynch Jason tomorrow, but the problem with that is, I wouldn't be able to investigate another night so there is no more help I could give.
Bruce, you're attitude is scum. Either Statham or Siggy is lying. Either we lose a SANE COP or we lose a pot lock role? The choice for which risk to take for a town aligned player should be obvious.
What are the two results you got? I'm not following. I see that one of them is that you're innocent. What was the other?
I went back and reread. I misinterpreted your confirmations as your investigations. I read it like
Sam is town
Jason is scum
Therefore I am a sane cop.
I went back and reread you longer post again. Sorry about that.
Anyway, Weaver and Statham are a conundrum right now. Weaver makes cop claim and isn't targeted. How odd. Even odder is that Statham is still alive but instead of being offed, he gets saved somehow (Governor in play?) and at night is blocked instead of Weaver. Why not block the cop from investigating?
Things for both of them seem overly convenient.
Jason get blocked or somehow screws up with his screwy role so he can't make any claims about anything today.
Weaver is in basically the same seat as yesterday but investigates herself to confirm innocence but that really only helps us if we believe her.
I keep going back and forth as to which one is mafia or if they are both mafia putting on a big show. Say we off Jason, now we implicitly believe Weaver despite all of the other stuff. Say we off Weaver, now do we implicitly believe Jason?
Soooo hard to determine ;_; I guess it all comes down to what you value more. Potential Cop or Potential Random power roles.
Also, I find it odd that Teddy didn't send him a PM assigning him a role at the end of the day. Wouldn't the Roleblocker only come into play when the night is complete? Shouldn't he have sent that role to him as soon as the day ended instead of waiting for the roleblocker to declare who they are blocking?
That doesn't make any sense. There's no Cop role, that I know of, that gets two investigations. It sounds like you're just making this up to be as absurd as possible in order to save your own hide. If you're scum, then you'd know if there was a mafia roleblocker and hell you may even be it yourself. Until a roleblocker is killed, we'd have no way of confirming that at all. Secondly, your 'innocent' result on yourself does not fit with the Insane theory and so I guess you see continuing to try and take me down as your only option to survive the day.
I wanted to give you a chance because the early cop claim just wasn't adding up but now I know for sure you are a big liar.
##Unvote: Johnson
##Vote: Sigourney Weaver
I grasp that you think I'm not a cop, but you're not correct. And instead of doing the right thing by testing my claim with Jason's lynch you instead want to lynch a person who claims cop over a person who claims fairy dust whatever he claimed actor thing.
You were already wrong with Neeson and you're going to be wrong again. Call that arrogant or whatever but I know I'm innocent so naturally I can say this with complete confidence, Brucey you're wrong. You however cannot say with complete confidence that you know whether a person is guilty or not. You're not the cop.
Statham isn't lying though, and Weaver is. It's not a risky process at all. Have you actually read anything Weaver has posted other than STATHAM IS GUILTY AND I AM INNOCENT BTW I'M TOTALLY THE COP LOL? All she has done all game is tell blatant lies. xDBruce, you're attitude is scum. Either Statham or Siggy is lying. Either we lose a SANE COP or we lose a pot lock role? The choice for which risk to take for a town aligned player should be obvious.
That's not for me to reveal, but yes, I was thanking the person who saved me. My guess is it was some kind of day Doctor or one-person Governor out there. It's not a role I've ever heard of but clearly someone's role messed with the vote because otherwise I would have been lynched.
If there isn't a role blocker then why didn't you get your role if you followed the rules?
I said it was a mod mistake probably that I got two results.
The first result I checked I got innocent, then the second one I checked said I got no result which means I someone probably tried to roleblock me.