Okay honestly, everything else aside, where are you getting this from? xD How many times to I, and whoever else it was in the thread have to point out that at no point in this entire game did I ever mention anything about Neeson other than to ask Dwayne Johnson why he was ignoring Neeson's questions? This is like the third time you've brought this up and I honestly don't have a clue what you're on about. Other than that this is again, more of your lies to deflect attention away from your bulltrout. Why you're trying to do that with even more blatant lies is beyond me, but there you go.You were already wrong with Neeson and you're going to be wrong again
Votecount
Weaver (3) - Willis, Ford, Craig, Statham
Statham (3) - Will Smith, Siggy, Uma
Johnson (1) -Statham,Statham, Arnold
Vin (1) - Jackson,Statham
Jacson (0) -Statham
Which would be all well and good, if she was the cop. Which she is not. I don't know what you find so hard to grasp about this. xDA cop can make assertions. Because they're a mothersmurfing cop
Hopefully that votecount was correct, I'm terrible at taking votecounts
We cannot risk killing Weaver while her claim is easily tested by killing Statham. You don't get two sane cops in a game. Anyone who cannot agree to this logic is scum.
Gah, ignore the third quote that wasn't suppose to be in that post
She's lying about it probably because it's absurd enough that she knew people like you would believe her. My guess there is a roleblocker on her team, they used their block on me, and is now trying to cook up a story to make me look bad.
You're blind defense of everything she's done is pretty damn suspicious as well. You don't even question it. I'm on to you.
I think Statham's guilty personally, but I still don't trust Weaver. It's almost impossible to trust what she says at this point. Of course she'd say she's innocent. Or wait,
ugh
thinking
So, if she's mafia in this situation, and she says she came up innocent, and then Statham dies and he's a townie, then Weaver's dead, straight up.
So basically, she's either telling the truth, or she knows she's a goner either way, and wants to take out one townie before she goes.
I have another suspicion, though, but I'm hoping someone else brings it up, because I wouldn't know how to use it to get any information, and it might spoil the effect.
I have acknowledged it, and I have also pointed out that it is stupid. Just saying "oh well if Statham dies and is town we can just lynch Weaver tomorrow derp" is ridiculous because we'll have lost a powerful and active townie, potentially another townie tonight and then we have to waste tomorrow's lynch on a mafia we already know about. And then potentially lose another townie that night as well. Nothing Weaver has done in this game has given any reason to anybody to believe she's a cop. She has lied the entire game to suit her own purposes and her cop claim itself is the most generic and safe route she could take to achieve the goal of getting Statham lynched because he is innocent and his role makes him an easy target. I have to say I am most intrigued by the way you're perfectly content to just swallow everything she says and risk a townie's life despite the fact that, and I re-iterate this for the 95th time, she's lied virtually every time she's said anything this entire game.
Oh I question it, I questioned it at the beginning of the day. But simply, it doesn't matter if she's lying. We will know if she's lying the moment you die. Perhaps you are a martyr, perhaps. But if you are than congrats, you're death outs a mobster, because a liar is scum and Siggy would be a proven liar (clearly not a sane cop as she claims to be if you flip scum). Simple logic tells us how to act here. The fact is ONE of you two are mafia because one of you has clearly lied about you're roles. But you don't risk killing a sane cop. You don't do that. You have the lesser role, you need to die so we know if Siggy is a cop, or is mafia. It's simple.
Here's a thought. If you don't trust me lynch the person I say is guilty then you'll see if I am lying or not. Now that I know I am not paranoid or insane, this absolutely makes Jason guilty. Please use logic guys.
Why would I get someone lynched if I know they're not guilty as that would automatically mean I would definitely be on the chopping block the next day?