I'm glad you're curious, because curiosity is always helpful in this game.
Not really sure how I could say it much differently than what I already said though.
Dude we are all paranoid. Especially since we have all have to watch our backs normally in all those shoot-em-ups we do.
The most sucpicious thing being done right now is all the unvoting being done. Why can't you just settle on one Segal, Statham, and Cage? Day 0 jitters?
We always settle on one; you only have one vote to give after all. But voting once and then spamming up the joint just isn't my style. The more votes cast, the more talk started; see your post above for a great example. Would you have made it if we didn't switch our votes? No! You would have been content to sit back and let the end of the day come (like a good mafioso). But that's not how I play mafia.
In the end my vote will be on the person I suspect the most. Why not stir the pot in the meantime? How would more posts hurt the town any? We need info.
This is why I dislike day 0/1 so much. It's always the biggest mess, and voting for anyone just feels like a shot in the dark.
Aiight dude I was just curious is all.
Day 0 accusations are all about the frequency of posting or who smells most in their posts. Now I don't know all the science mombo jumbo bits to a mafia game but almost always has mafia fallen among the three posting frequencies analysis so there's probably a mafia who hasn't posted, posted a lot, and posted maybe 4 times. All I'm thinking is that accusing based on posting frequencies is a bit ridiculous.
This is only Day 0 and yet already so much to read over in one sitting. If there's still time today to my post something in reply to all this I will. Until then, going to keep reading over the thread and kicking alien ass.
Oh you know, just walking around in my underwear, sweating profusely, breathing heavily. The usual. Real answer is I had a crap load of work to do yesterday and today. If you say Mafia Scum is more important than that, then please pay my bills. Speaking of lives, I have to point out something.
Considering it's Day Zero, this doesn't really matter. Town outweighs the Mafia at the start of the game, so a few late stragglers for today does not a difference make.
Not saying don't go for inactives. They can be Mafia too, but this early on it would be better to go for people based on their voting and reasoning until we know who is playing the laying low game, or who just has a life.
Because my first vote was a joke vote. The only reason I made that vote was because of the word mafian was used.
Changing my vote is not a bad thing to do. Sometimes changing votes constantly is what is necessary to throw the mafia off guard and catch them. Other times it make you look like a psychopath so it's a gamble
for smurf's sake let's not vote inactives again
you know a scum who wants to live won't coast at the start
also mafian is not a word.
mafia? sure. mafioso/mafiosi? absolutely. scum? fine. not mafian.
brb fixing my shift key
I think someone's getting too caught up over the correct terminology of "mafioso".
Yeah this is all boring. Enough of the "Day 0/1" garbage. We all know what day it is. We all know our votes are mostly crap, but we have to vote somebody. This is action star mafia, full of manly men and womanly women. So nut up/boob up and vote!
At least when I was swapping votes it got people talking. Do you want me to start doing that again?