I like lynching the guy who's probably guilty. All this talk about lynching Statham just to find out if Weaver's a liar...that's just stupid.

There are too many weird things going on already, plus all of the already weird combinations of roles, to say: kill statham, when he comes up guilty, that makes weaver totally innocent.

Listen I don't know this game like the rest of you, but even I can figure out several different scenarios in which Statham's death tells us nothing.

Situations in which Statham turns up guilty:
1. Statham's a death miller. Weaver could be telling the truth, or could be lying.
2. Statham really is mafia. Yet:
a. It's all a setup to make Statham's mafia partner Weaver look like pure goodness the rest of the game.
b. There are two mafias and they're in different mafias and think each other town. (In this situation Weaver could even be telling the truth that she's a cop...a mafia cop)
c. Weaver did check Statham, he came up guilty, she's telling the truth, but she was roleblocked and is lying about the innocent result on herself because she's afraid to say that she had no result last night. (which would mean she's a pro-town but more concerned about herself than the town, and we can't trust her as a cop)

Situations in which Statham turns up innocent:
1. Statham's the godfather, and Weaver is a usurper. (not likely, they'd never act this openly, but still)
2. Weaver's been lying the whole time.
3. Weaver's an Insane Mafia Cop. Think on that one for a sec. Okay so I made it up. But with all the other ridiculous things happening that I can't make sense of, why the hell not, right?
4. Weaver's insane or paranoid and lying about her result last night. (just laying out possibilities folks)
5. Weaver was roleblocked last night, is lying about her investigation, and is gambling that Statham's really guilty.
6. Statham's a jester. And:
a. Weaver's some new jester-helper role.
b. Weaver's paranoid or insane.
c. Weaver's mafia and lying.
7. Does death miller have its opposite mafia role? Someone turns up innocent even though they're guilty.

Basically, either way it goes we haven't actually learned anything certain about Weaver, no matter how you goofs spin it. When is anything in this game open/shut? Statham's guilt doesn't make Weaver innocent, Statham's innocence doesn't make Weaver guilty.

It's odd that someone who thinks the rest of us are idiots is unwilling to recognize the possible realities of this situation. An actual smart pro-town unselfish player wouldn't be so quick to throw someone under the bus so quickly. (RIP Neeson)

Seems to me that the cop role sucks unless played really really well. In this game it's just caused confusion. (at least for me)

It makes just as much sense killing Weaver to figure out Statham's guilt/innocence as it is killing Statham to place Weaver.
Read: NONE.

At this point I'm more inclined to think they're both guilty than anything. I'm waiting on Johnson to show up and change my mind or confirm my suspicions before I move back to Statham. There's just so much nonsense going on in that situation I don't want anything to do with it atm. Not to mention (why has nobody brought this up?), what if whatever power protected Statham protects him again?? This seems like a perfect damn situation for the mafia to keep offing town with little 3-4 vote lynchings.