Upon reflection, I have gotten the impression that the "journalist" is trying to rationalize the 2DS as the next stage in Nintendo's handheld family. GB > GBC > GBA > DS > 3DS( > 2DS?). Like developers are all of a sudden just going to start making 2DS games because that's the new console. They seem to be completely missing the point. The 2DS is merely an alternative for the 3DS. No different than the XL is in that regard. Its the same as the DSi compared to the DS (albeit a step backwards rather than forward). But the point is, developers will still be making 3DS games. For the 3DS. Which the 2DS will simply be capable of playing as well. Nothing more. Its not an evolution. Just an option