Comparing the Bonnie and Clyde thing to these Duck Dynasty folks is comparing apples and oranges. Allowing a show to air about two lovebirds who have gone down in history vs. an old white hick bastard making intolerant comments are not the same things in any capacity. The Duck Dynasty dude is very much alive and is fully capable of controlling his actions, and I don't think it's okay to say, "well you allowed this completely unrelated thing to happen, why can't I act the way I want to act!" That's shifting blame and responsibility and it's stupid. Everyone knows the nature of Bonnie and Clyde's story and killing and robbing is pretty commonplace among television shows and regular media. Comments slighting a specific sexual preference are not.

I don't understand how his comments can be viewed as "not anti-gay" and I don't understand that it's intolerant to disagree purely because it's based on religion. If they weren't religious and had these same views, would it still not be intolerant then?

NCG is so spot on with this issue.