Oh, finally, you responded. However, as shown earlier, you edited your knights little by little in order to counter their strategies, so that's not specifically for one side either. Additionally, these ninjas aren't just good against you - they're very good in general. I tried it out myself recently (although at a much lower level), as well as the knights (again, much lower level).
I'm pretty sure it works just as wlel against samurais, monks and lancers. Don't forget, those classes don't specifically have low faith either. And it's not like the ninjas have a very high speed, throw (chaos blades), as well as 2 swords. Then there's the whole assasin thing..but that's beside the point.
Can you be a little more specific against the ninjas? You're not really being specific, so.
And again, they both work generally well. The knights would be beaten in such a case, and they'd both do just as well in random battles. I cannot see, at the current standpoint, why the ninjas wouldn't generally win. And besides, it's not a competition of whether the ninjas are ultimate, but rather whether the knights are ultimate. And this has just proven that they aren't, until proven otherwise. This whole thread is whether knights are ultimate, not whether if there are any other classes that are more ultimate (although one can argue assasin, and the ninjas so far are right up there if not past). Most of the people who were in the discussion said as well, that their point arguing otherwise is there is 'no ultimate team in FFT', so.
Anyways, I'd like to see what other people have to say about htis.
And for the comments, again, ass is an opinion why stupidity is not (although that as well, to some extent is opinionated). If I was one to declare it to be low to do such a thing, I believe most would have the integrety to follow it themselves. Of course, that's just from my standpoint here.