So let's talk about a Remake.

[chionos]

So anyway.

I'd prefer no cutscenes, actually, unless they're going to go all out and spend a ton of money to really make some worthwhile full-on FMV, like the opening to FFIV remake. They won't, they'll just use the game models, and I'd rather use my imagination. Game model movies do nothing for me. In fact, sometimes they take away from the game. As in, gosh I imagined it WAY better than this. If they're not going to go balls-to-the-wall, I'd rather them not waste their time or my time on it. Like Valo said, if they're going to give it a FFIV update, I'd rather see FFV.

[Colonel Angus]

The point is, WHO would we get to voice for WHO? (who/whom? whom/who? I still can't get that right.)

[chionos]

The point is, WHO would we get to voice for WHO? (who/whom? whom/who? I still can't get that right.)

whom/whom
grammar
To find out, answer the question with pronouns. If you'd use he/she, then it should be "who." If you'd use him/her, then it should be "whom."

e.g.
We would get Cate Blanchett to voice Celes.
i.e.
We would get her to voice her.

Who is the subject, the object is whom.

Well according to most of you, just get John DiMaggio and let him do all the voices. Easy enough right?

[VeloZer0]

I actually like cut-scenes done with in-game models much better than ones with far more detailed ones. I find it ruins the immersion when all of a sudden the characters look different.

[escobert]

I would like to see a remake. I was very happy with III and really want to try IV. It might get me into VI.

[The Man]

The point is, WHO would we get to voice for WHO? (who/whom? whom/who? I still can't get that right.)

whom/whom

To find out, answer the question with pronouns. If you'd use he/she, then it should be "who." If you'd use him/her, then it should be "whom."

e.g.
We would get Cate Blanchett to voice Celes.
i.e.
We would get her to voice her.

Who is the subject, the object is whom.

Doesn't that make it who/whom? Because the first "who" is the subject, unless I'm severely mistaken

[Sephiroth]

Make a cel-shaded Anime graphics PS4 Remake with Anime cutscenes.

[Spooniest]

I would prefer if there were some consistency in the character models. Perhaps they could make their first ultra-realistic FF? You know, make the character models the way they look in the opening FMV for a change?

Separate train of thought: one of the keys here is going to be the speed of the battle engine. Even if it's not full-on ATB (even though Final Fantasy X-2 was...?), it should move and animate FAST, like we're talking no time to breathe at all.

http://youtu.be/qVWI4TgRFMM?t=40s

Note: Please ignore the mush-mouthed "announcer"...people just don't know how to talk into a microphone these days...

But observe. And listen to this instead while you do.

You notice, animations don't take up nearly as much time. The rule should be: as flashy as you want, but finished within a 5 second time frame. Get the game MOVING!

It's bad enough we have to deal with super long load times, installation, downloads and junk like that in the last generation, don't WASTE MY TIME. Final Fantasy VI was cool for precisely this reason...it's a JRPG but it gets on with it!!!

[Sephiroth]

I prefer this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvS0REaNCLE

[chionos]

grammar for aaron
quoted stuff

The point is, WHO would we get to voice for WHO? (who/whom? whom/who? I still can't get that right.)

whom/whom

To find out, answer the question with pronouns. If you'd use he/she, then it should be "who." If you'd use him/her, then it should be "whom."

e.g.
We would get Cate Blanchett to voice Celes.
i.e.
We would get her to voice her.

Who is the subject, the object is whom.

Doesn't that make it who/whom? Because the first "who" is the subject, unless I'm severely mistaken

That first "who" isn't the subject of the sentence, "we" is. Which noun in the sentence is doing the verb? Ewww, that sounds dirty. "Would get" is an action being done by "we."
You could move the sentence around to make it clearer: We would get whom to voice for whom? You can see there that "we" is clearly the subject.

Sephiroth. That sounds terrible. Not kidding, if they do that I'll never play another SE game ever again. Not that I'm against cel-shading or anime style, it just doesn't fit FFVI. At all.

That video reminded me, one of the big things for me is the sound effects. The early FFs had spot-on perfect sound design. The fizzy sound of the Aura Bolt, Edgar's tools, the sound of opening a chest, even the menu sounds were specific and seemed to fit. And I think part of it was that the sounds were dirty, earthy, deep. I think some of the later games move away from this toward flash, glitz, and shine which feels much less immersive for me.

[The Man]

Oh you're right. That's what I get for posting while half asleep.

I don't like the idea of a cel-shaded remake. I do like that remake of The Decisive Battle Sephiroth posted though. More stuff like that would be cool.

[Sephiroth]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfSDhnuMPQQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SyLJ3MuQrs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CF6BH5MFG2U

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CF6BH5MFG2U

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJeOJ3zcs4E

Provide some context duder.

The context is already given by me having posted what I imagine the graphics and music of a remake to be like. You should train analyzing before replying to every comment with another claim that is wrong in context of what user x said. I am the same Sephiroth person posting his thoughts about remade versions before. And a user even replied he would like some more like that.

[chionos]

Provide some context duder.

[Slothy]

If anyone were to do a remake, it should be done right. Forget about 3D and make it in the style of the original Amano concept art. I suppose it could be done in 3D if it were made to look that way as well, but my god I don't want to think about how much of a pain it'd be to program those shaders.

[VeloZer0]

See the thing is I don't think that the sprites from FF6 look anything like the Amano art. And I don't even like the Amano art.