Quote Originally Posted by Shorty View Post
The simplest explanation to me is that Jay has a whole weird and wired and shady past, characteristic, demeanor, and he can't even keep his story straight in any consistency whatsoever. The simplest explanation to me points that through all of these inconsistencies, Jay is guilty of something. I can't definitively say murder because there is no sustained evidence of it, but he appears to be guilty of something nonetheless. I get this feeling much more from him than I do from Adnan. After all of the lies he's told, the fact that any of Jay's testimony taken into consideration at all is incredulous to me. To quote someone from Reddit, "Jay has an answer for everything and when he forgets what the answer was, he makes a new one up. That's why his story changes, because he's a lying stoner that has forgotten his lies."
All this is true. It seems that a lot of people boil this case down to: either Adnan is guilty, or Jay is a liar. But clearly both can be (and probably are) true.