Quote Originally Posted by sharkythesharkdogg View Post
Quote Originally Posted by SuperMillionaire View Post
It just goes to show you that apparently, explicitness is the norm in music today, and that also apparently, Disney stars have a history of using the classic marketing technique of "sex sells" to further their career and maintain relevance when they grow up.
I adjusted your statement a little. There's nothing new to this.

As has already been pointed out, showing some skin or singing about certain subjects doesn't make someone a "bad" person. If anything, in situations like this, it just makes them a smart business person because that's what sells. There's far worse things than a fully nude person.
Yes, sex does sell, but there's a difference between regular sex and explicit sex, which is sex that is sleazy and uses shock value, and what these stars are engaging in is sex that shocks and is sleazy. I don't mind sex, and I actually like it, as long as it's done decently. The problem is that it's done indecently; it's indecent exposure.