Yeah I was about to say, now that you're a known entity, the witches might leave you be with your threatening power of candy.
Yeah I was about to say, now that you're a known entity, the witches might leave you be with your threatening power of candy.
If she was the girl with the gummy bears she got up but decided not to do anything. No kill last night shows a protection to me. She was the hit man last night I think.
Anyway:
Now that we know Nutty has 'some form of' watching role, there's a few candidates for his identity and ability name. But I'm keeping quiet. The whole Pained thing and all.
Good gravy you guys
Or all the witches and the cynic were using their other power
Nutty' trying to pull a coup de gravyOriginally Posted by Pumpkin
By you guys I mean FFNut and his flimsy arguments and the rest of you INSULTING THE POWER OF CANDY
You'll also notice an adult walking through the halls who seemed happy to see the man with the erect sword.
I mean, as far we know, there were at least two people who tried to do something but couldn't. As well as that creepy person who dared anyone to approach.
Seriously, look how he acted when I raised suspicions about him. I've at least been able to somewhat back up my claims, but he has done a poor job of backing up his or defending himself. Really now
Assuming we can trust Pumpkin's roleclaim, that means the killer is either the the adult happy to see the sword man, or the creepy daring person.
How'd you get that one? All I know is that my role didn't go through either from a block or because TSoL didn't do nuffin in the narrative
That sounded more accusatory than I meant it to, btw. I really just don't fully understand
There's a possibility the "killer" didn't appear in the narrative because of the rewriting character
And again, it's possible no one attempted to kill anyone
I'm assuming a killer tried to do kill someone. Of course, they could choose not to kill, but I find that unlikely. If the narrative is accurate, that means the killer would've been mentioned at some point in the narrative.
You're candy girl, who tried to sweeten the pot. If we believe you, then you're not the killer.
Intimidating Sword Guy used a mass-roleblock. He can't be the killer.
The adult walking in the halls? Not sure what he did. He could've been the killer until he got blocked.
The creepy person in the room? Sounds dangerous, that's for sure.
Of course, this all assumes that a Town roleblocker can block night kills like a doctor can. I have literally no experience with Town blockers. This is just one theory, and to be honest it does assume quite a lot. I mean, people can not be the killer, but still be witch-aligned, for example.
And Pumpkin could easily be Pained and now she triggered it and she's out to get everyone. Pained can roleclaim to activate themselves.
I have an ability that allows me to see what abilities are performed on others. From that list, I can ask for one to be explained. I targeted Fynn. He had Intimidate and Stealth. I asked about the former. I was told it can be used to one shot prevent from a nightlife or use regularly a protect one person like a doctor. This is why when Fynn denied a mass protect ability I found it weird, because from the narrative and what I got that's exactly what happened. Plus the rest of Fynn's argument relies on highly conditional stuff that seemed improbable and too much conjecture. Like no nightkill would be weird.
I will reiterate that I copied and pasted my statement from Karifean.
Posting Permissions
