Originally Posted by
Rita
Your hypothesis was flimsy, your evidence was non-existent at the time of your accusation and circumstantial at best after the skit. Your guess may have ended up being correct, but don't try to dress it up as good science.
Yeah, you like to say that and talk a big scientist game, but let's look at your evidence compared to mine, eh?
Originally Posted by
[M] Rita
Well, I think I'm gonna go with Mikleo as well. I don't really buy that inactivity == guilt (my research takes a lot of time during the day), but I do think just showing up to activate a skit and not really discussing the results is a little suspect.
I won't vote for her though, at least not tonight, as I don't think I could convince a majority to distrust sweet little Elize. And I don't have any compelling evidence either, just a gut feeling.
So instead I'll vote for Mikleo. I think the likelihood of his guilt is high enough to take the risk.
[##vote: Mikleo]
Meanwhile, I admit before the skit that I was mostly focused on him being a yes man doing an excellent job of avoiding attention.
However, I'd already discussed aallll of this before Colette's skit.
Originally Posted by
Pascal
Skits have confirmed:
Two roles canceled each other out night one.
There's no night kill night one, but mafia did try to kill someone night one.
There's only one roleblocker.
Once Colette admitted her situation and no one counter-claimed her, Lloyd was the best idea we had. Even you admit that now after the skit.
Originally Posted by
Rita
The skits completely backed up her side of the story, but then she went and voted for Velvet.
So a good scientist would stop trying to shoot down her colleague's work and say it was nothing more than a lucky guess.
I even mentioned how after she made her admission about blocking Lloyd, that it REALLY lined up with my theory. Colette made an odd choice, that I think was sadly motivated by the fact that no one was looking at LLoyd but me. I think it's because she saw the same writing on the wall I did. Everyone was too busy arguing over lists or trying to lynch Mikleo for being extremely quiet. Not the most sound reasoning, but what can you do?
ALL the evidence was weak, but mine was the strongest reasoning. That is fact. The most flimsy hypothesis, with the most non-existent evidence was yours and everyone else's band wagon theory on Mikleo. I think the current situation of a dead jailer and a dead enabler should keep you from still trying to argue that point. I warned you ahead of time, and you can ignore that if you want, but it's dangerous. A good scientist can swallow their pride, look at the situation, and admit when they were out thought. So come on, buddy! Let's work together! Cheria tells me I'm wrong for not bathing and trying to touch Sophie almost everyday. It doesn't mean we can't get something wrong and bounce back.
Even now LLoyd's standing by his weak reasoning. So I'll summarize again and then I've done all I can
My reasoning:
Two role's blocked
EACH OTHER.
One of those role's was Colette as a Jailer. She tried to jail LLoyd.
It was blocked. Since it was blocked by the
OTHER person according to skit information, that person was Lloyd. Not some third party he's removed from.
There was a chance that he was a good aligned role blocker and it was friendly fire.
Except he didn't try to use that angle, because I suspect he didn't see it. He just went with classic mafia denial, and now the evidence has caught him out and he can't go back.
Lloyd's evidence.
Originally Posted by
Lloyd
Of course two people cancelled each other. I never intended on claiming that was not the case. But, again, the ones that cancelled each other were not Colette and I. I don't know who it was.