But we haven't got all the facts set down, and there hasn't been repetition. I'm personally quite interested to hear a genuine arguement against R=U other than th Angelo one. If you read ed's post it quite clearly asked for this.
But we haven't got all the facts set down, and there hasn't been repetition. I'm personally quite interested to hear a genuine arguement against R=U other than th Angelo one. If you read ed's post it quite clearly asked for this.
I say what I think. If you disagree, then that is up to you.