Originally posted by PhoenixAsh
Well I'm not defending it in here because there's a perfectly good thread for that, but I might as well back up my point.



There is evidence, you just don't accept it. So given there IS evidence and you have dismissed it you can't have considered believing in it. So none of that sentence is true.



It's based on explaining many things in the game that don't make sense without some kind of theory. Even if the first half of your sentence was true, noone is forcing you to call it garbage so that is also innacurate.


That was all you said so I stand by my statement.
Except it's NOT evidence because it's based on assumptions of little things throughout the game. It's a theory. The game doesn't develop the theory. It DOES provide little things that can be used to create the R=U theory, but it does not develop them. The "evidence" IMO is something that has been stretched so far it's ridiculous. Since the game neither concludes that the R=U theory is true, nor does it say it's wrong you are not right and neither am I. The only people who can actually confirm or disprove the R=U theory as those at Square, and I believe there was a website, or something out there where they had declared it innaccurate, however, without the link that obviously holds no merit so I won't even use it to defend myself.

Secondly, like I stated above, since the game doesn't state, or even develop the R=U theory in any way I don't have to accept it because I don't see the logic in it. At least with Squall and Laguna there are hints of their relationship throughout the game. I may as well say that Irvine and Selphie are Ultimecia if I'm going to believe the R = U theory because there's about as much backing that up.