What? no no no, first,
the whole flooding thing is sarcasm directed at your own sarcasm about flooding mainframes and blowing up the world.

Youre loosing me here, Square would be flooded right now with no answer. When they give an answer what ever it may be, truthful, or not, itll end it, it will shut everyone up. and it can be the truth or a lie in order to get some peace.

You said confirming would cause more emails,

"Yes, because revealing that R=U is going to threaten SquareEnix security! Things will go insane! Internet people will ask even more questions... so many questions that it will overload the mainframe and the entire world will be destroyed!"

I am making reference to a flood of questions exposing a premature idea that they dont want to discuss. So they could extinguish it with a big NO, if we were to be stumbling on their project.

So by answering the question with a NO, hey, it can be a no, or just a fib to shut us up so they dont have to dedicate their night to it like we are.

"If" that is the whole problem, if they do confirm it. They really haven't as far as Ive seen. I saw some remnants but not really credible as you described. Even if they did officially, it still may not be credible.

"One slip of what? Obviously Square would have a policy on what questions would be answered."

thats what I mean, square would make a policy of what questions were to be answered in order to avoid a slip in giving confidential info that they dot want released. I mean hell, an R=U would spark something big like you said.