Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 34

Thread: Mission To Mars

  1. #1
    Away Founder Cid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    In your tree.
    Posts
    2,049
    Articles
    141
    Contributions
    • Created Eyes on Final Fantasy
    • Former Administrator

    Default Mission To Mars

    Do you think it's a mighty big waste of the US' resources or do you think it's a great idea?

    I like the idea, personally. I'd be scared to death if I was in the captains seat though, as it seems everything can and does go wrong on the unmanned missions so far.

  2. #2
    Posts Occur in Real Time edczxcvbnm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    The World
    Posts
    7,920

    Default

    Going to mars now....nope. Eventually yes. But its just a waste of money to go there now. What benifit does it gain us? A bigger deficit? Fix the problems on earth first...then look to the future on these other things.


  3. #3
    Scatter, Senbonzakura... DocFrance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    The high, untrespassed sanctity of space
    Posts
    2,805

    Default

    I think it's a great idea. We've got to start somewhere, ya know.
    ARGUMENT FROM GUITAR MASTERY
    (1) Eric Clapton is God.
    (2) Therefore, God exists.

  4. #4
    Posts Occur in Real Time edczxcvbnm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    The World
    Posts
    7,920

    Default

    We are starting somewhere. A space station that seems to have endless problems. If the WORLD can't get that right then I have next to no hope of a mission to mars doing anything great. It would be a 5 year mission...or so.

    This idea sounds just as stupid now as it did back in 1990.

  5. #5
    Old school, like an old fool. Flying Mullet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Napping in a peach tree.
    Posts
    19,185
    Articles
    6
    Blog Entries
    7
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight
    • Former Senior Site Staff

    Default

    I like the idea because they are developing new spacecraft for the Mars mission, eventually curbing the current space shuttles. This will mean that the civilian populations will benefit from the technology in fast air travel, etc. I tend to approve of scientific developments when there is some benefit to the population, rather than just doing it to say we did it or to quench some scientist's curiosity.

    But then I'm a bit of a romanticist when it comes to new technology and the future so I'm excited to see what will happen.

    And on the fixing problems at home bit, I'm in agreement with it, but NASA's always had that budget and people were doing just fine 5-8 years ago. It just seems that people put themselves in a whole slew of debt during the dot.com race (much like the Great Depression, borrowing against borrowed money, etc...) and after the bubble burst they were in a world of hurt and now they want the govoernment to bail them out.
    Figaro Castle

  6. #6
    Posts Occur in Real Time edczxcvbnm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    The World
    Posts
    7,920

    Default

    I don't mean the economy(this will fix itself eventually). I mean the government's deficit that keeps getting bigger. Make some cuts someplace.

    I agree that we will get new technology like everytime they go into space and do something new. I just don't think the time is right.

    I would rather see that frickin moon base. At least that technology would be more applicable. A self contained environment with some ultra insillation to keep heat in during those cold nights and other things. It would help a hell of a lot more on earth with this over population thing we go going on. Also we can ship people to live on the moon.

    I also don't think we should go to the moon yet.

  7. #7
    Old school, like an old fool. Flying Mullet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Napping in a peach tree.
    Posts
    19,185
    Articles
    6
    Blog Entries
    7
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight
    • Former Senior Site Staff

    Default

    I am so totally glad that I got that email and that I bought my plot of land on the moon for $20. It will be so worth it when the government decides to build on my land and they have to pay me the big bucks. :rolleyes:

    Yeah, I agree that the deficit is getting bigger, but I don't know the specifics of how much the space program is using versus other programs. That's one of my beefs with the media, they latch onto an area in our nation's budget and make it out to be a rotten section, rather than showing us the entire picture of how the budget it allocated and letting us decide which section is too bloated.
    Figaro Castle

  8. #8
    Posts Occur in Real Time edczxcvbnm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    The World
    Posts
    7,920

    Default

    Originally posted by Flying Mullet
    Yeah, I agree that the deficit is getting bigger, but I don't know the specifics of how much the space program is using versus other programs. That's one of my beefs with the media, they latch onto an area in our nation's budget and make it out to be a rotten section, rather than showing us the entire picture of how the budget it allocated and letting us decide which section is too bloated.
    Agreed on that one. I just think the government spends too much in every area in general. If they cut a bit from everything then it would be fine.

  9. #9
    ORANGE Dr Unne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Posts
    7,394
    Articles
    1
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Developer
    • Former Tech Admin

    Default

    2/3 of all missions to Mars have failed, and all they're doing is shooting a computer at it. How are they going to find someone who's willing to do something with at least a 66% chance of death?

    I'm all for the space program though. The pursuit of science is one of the best things that we can do as a society.

  10. #10
    Take me to your boss! Strider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    4,340
    Articles
    52

    Default

    There was someone, I think it was a comedian, who made the comment that Bush should concentrate on matters involving this hunk of rock before focusing on other big hunks of rock in space.

    I wholeheartedly agree with that viewpoint.

  11. #11
    Posts Occur in Real Time edczxcvbnm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    The World
    Posts
    7,920

    Default

    I say we can spend our money better by sending all the nukes and other WMD to the sun!!!!!

  12. #12
    Your very own Pikachu! Banned Peegee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Posts
    19,488
    Blog Entries
    81

    Grin

    I second that, but we can't send nuclear weapons into the air for fear that they might malfunction and send lots of radiation into the earth (which is why the 'send nuclear waste into the sun' plan isn't good).

    I support the mission to mars, but I find their methods oddly stupid. Remember way way back in the day when they tried to drop a probe through the polar ice caps (of course you don't)? Well, both my brother and I knew it would fail, and it did, just like we predicted.

    Just land a ^@!(*ing shuttle on the surface just like an airplane would land. Granted you would have to fly a great deal of time to conquer the gravitational pull, but sheesh....

    Ah forget it.

  13. #13
    Doc Skogs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    A Land Down Under
    Posts
    1,452

    Default

    I think that the mission to Mars is a cheap publicity stunt to gain more popularity for George Bush before the next election. It's a waste of money, cost/benefit is ludicrously high. What's even better for Bush is that he won't even be power to take the blame when NASA goes massively over budget and money has to be shifted out of health care and schools.
    Last edited by Skogs; 01-26-2004 at 09:09 PM.

  14. #14
    Old school, like an old fool. Flying Mullet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Napping in a peach tree.
    Posts
    19,185
    Articles
    6
    Blog Entries
    7
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight
    • Former Senior Site Staff

    Default

    Originally posted by Pureghetto
    I second that, but we can't send nuclear weapons into the air for fear that they might malfunction and send lots of radiation into the earth (which is why the 'send nuclear waste into the sun' plan isn't good).
    But it worked in Superman 4!

    Yeah, it's hard to concieve how the mission to Mars would work, but hopefully we'll get a lot of helpful technologocial advances from it, if anything.
    Figaro Castle

  15. #15
    Posts Occur in Real Time edczxcvbnm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    The World
    Posts
    7,920

    Default

    I don't think a mission to another planet would really give us that many more technoloical advances as we have done that with the moon. They will probably use the same stuff but just make it better.

    Thats why we need to work on Space Station and Space colonies(on the moon or orbiting earth). Those would bring about more as it is working on a self contained enviornment and what not.

    I know! Lets send a monkey to pluto!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •