I so much like the dripping attitude in that post, Talus. Very nice. You missed my point. So what if he approves of the attacks? That's irrelevant. It's not grounds to arrest him, and certainly not grounds to bomb him, or any other country who supports them. Giving money to known terrorists would be grounds for an arrest, as aiding criminals is illegal. Approving of them, or having paintings of their attacks is not. Those also aren't proof of him actually supporting (funding, helping etc) anything at all. It's all speculation. There's a big difference between agreeing with what they did, and funding it. I believe goyabean & co meant that Saddam wasn't linked to the attacks, which he wasn't. Whether or not he approved of them isn't, and shouldn't be an issue.
