And I think this thread no longer has anything to do with anything like the original topic, so I'll close it soon unless that changes.

Incidentally... Saddam Hussein and Augusto Pinochet both had a lot of support in their countries. Does that mean we're all attacking the Iraqi and Chilean people whenever we criticise those two? Of course not.
Criticising George Bush is criticising George Bush, nothing more. If you don't like Russel Crowe, you're not displayinghatred for Hollywood and its frontrunners who're "elected" by profit margins and management teams. If you think Tony Blair has bad ties, then that doesn't mean you're attacking UK fashion sense. If you take offense because someone dares not to like your leader, then that's up to you; but to most people it'll look like you're just trying to (a) pick a fight or (b) justify forcing one people's views onto another.

If it's "anti-American" to dislike Bush, then that'd mean that the Nobel committee is full of "terrorists" if they don't award him the prize, which of course is a ridiculous accusation.