FFO has no FF1 section, so I've never liked them. FFWA has no FF1 section either, so the heck with them too. You should put "Eyes on Final Fantasy: We Actually Have an FF1 Section"
FFO has no FF1 section, so I've never liked them. FFWA has no FF1 section either, so the heck with them too. You should put "Eyes on Final Fantasy: We Actually Have an FF1 Section"
Is FF1 so obscure that nobody knows enough to make a walkthrough/guide/etc for it?
there's some other site with a good bit of ff content, maybe ffaddicts.but i'm sure they suck too.
FF2 and 3 are much more obscure.
I actually first found this site looking for help with FF2
Proud to be the Unofficial Secret Illegal Enforcer of Eyes on Final Fantasy!
When I grow up, I want to go toBovineTrump University! - Ralph Wiggum
Yeah, but Proto gets all mad if someone tells him to 'cram it', so I tried to make more indirect by adding Bleys' smiley. :bleysOriginally posted by The Man
Why did you put the bleys smiley in there? Proto's obviously the one who needs to cram it.
('-'*)/ - "sup"
that's so true.Originally posted by Cid
FF2 and 3 are much more obscure.
frankly, though, i'm surprised at how few sites really have ff1 and ff2 content, especially seeing as they were just recently re-released in enhanced versions. i'd have expected sites like ffwa and ffo, at least, to have them, given the insane number of people who visit each forum. but apparently not. then again, they don't have open site development forums, which is probably part of the reason eoff has so much better content, but it can't be the whole reason, because eoff had comprehensive ff1-10 sections before the open source forum became public.
I made FFWA administration the same offer I made EoFF, a few years back; they could have my entire site for their FF1 section. They never did it though. People just don't care about the old games. Their loss though. FF1 is much more popular than people would think. 5.6 million pagehits for my site, and my site is only about one old NES game. If I had the patience to run an MB it'd probably be triple that.