Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 19 of 19

Thread: omg mozilla firebox is teh sux

  1. #16
    Banned MecaKane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,002

    Default

    I downloaded a windows 98 ISO, virtual PC, respective keys, installed them, UNinstalled VPC, reinstalled it with options I didn't know I'd need, all so I could play Blade Runner again. <3

    And it was worth it, that game is freaking awesome.

  2. #17
    Your very own Pikachu! Banned Peegee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Posts
    19,488
    Blog Entries
    81

    Grin

    How can a ftp program allow you to upload 3x faster? That makes no sense. BoB's a fillfthy liar.

  3. #18
    Hypnotising you crono_logical's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Back in Time
    Posts
    9,313
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    <div align="justify">By using multiple connectins to the server


    During the server move, I found I could get 50 k/s upload for data for this site (for a single connection), so the time to send the actual data was approximately 3 hours.

    However, for each file you send, due to the FTP protocol, you must send control data to the server to tell it the filename and where to save etc. and wait for a reply saying what port to send to and if it's ready etc. - this will take at least twice the ping time between you and server - in my case 1/3 s. With approximately 60,000 files, you can now clearly see the amount of time just sitting and waiting and not actually sending files but doing "paperwork" as it were amounts to almost twice the time than it takes to upload the data itself, which is clearly stupid Yes, it did end up taking around 9 hours solid, even on my connection, to upload all this

    So if an FTP program can use multiple connections to upload, then one connection could be using the bandwidth during the idle time of the other connection awaiting instructions, hence cutting the overall waiting time

    To keep things simple (since this server is kinda more complicated on bandwidth per connection bit), if I was capped at the 50 k/s as I mentioned earlier, (which is almost twice what BoB's connection allows him to uplaod at,) then yes, I'd have seen almost a 3x improvement in upload time had I used an FTP program capable of concurrent connections and it was keeping that 50 k/s maxed out between all the connections at all times </div>
    Problems playing downloaded videos? Try CCCP


  4. #19

    Default

    All these free programs out there...

    Answer to your browser problems: Opera. (You can find keys to register it anytime)
    Answer to your media player problems: iTunes (easy, full control of your library), foobar2000 (for those who love it simple, fast, etc...)
    Answer to your FTP problems: SmartFTP
    Answer to your messanging problems: Trillian

    Those answered my problems! (IE, WMP, WS FTP, AIM)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •