Originally posted by darkchrono
lol, well all I have to say now is that you guys seem to have about as high of morality and responsibility level as Ms. Jolie has.
Yes, I'm sure insulting people's morality is likely to get you on their good side.

And regardless of what you guys try to respond back by saying. You guys are the ones who are wrong. Go pose the question to 95% of parents out there and you will then discover it.
Yes, I'm sure the majority is always right on everything. Which is why Bush is the president.

And abominatrix. Do you think it is ok to RISK the chance of getting a disease even if the chances are less then 50%. You are saying that is ok to risk it simply because the chances are less than great. And it is ok to risk getting pregnant again simply because she has the money to afford it.
If condoms are used properly, the risk is FAR lower than fifty percent. I don't know the exact statistics, but I believe it is indeed less likely than getting in a fatal or life-threatening car accident.

Nothing is full proof. And she is putting the well-being of her kid on the line when she is taking those RISKS.
How? SHE'S the one having sex. Not her kid. Her kid isn't at all at risk of getting any STDs from Angelina's having sex.

That is how it effects her kid at this point even if the kid doesn't know about it.
It doesn't affect her kid.

By your opinions. It would be ok for you to go out and start using drugs and to become an alcoholic and have sex with tons of people if your parents did not find out.
Actually, that's not what we're saying at all. We're saying it doesn't have any effect on what kind of parent she is. Guess what, you can have sex with lots of people and still take care of your child! Guess what, having promiscuous sex doesn't mean you won't be able to instill a sense of moral values in your children, especially if they're not around to know you're having promiscuous sex. Which they shouldn't be. Kids don't know everything about their parents' lives naturally anyway, and they shouldn't. You raise children well by the example what you let them see, not what you do when they're not around. I'm not saying it's necessarily morally right or wrong to do things behind your children's back, but what your kids don't know about has no effect on how well you raise your kids, as long as it doesn't impact your behaviour while you're actually around them.

And please do not come back with that silly getting in a car accident or making movies analogy again. As that is just plain silly.
It's pretty accurate, actually.

And you show a lack of parental instincts by showing a complete lack of responsibility for anything other than yourself. The fact that you say it is ok to do all that stuff shows that you are not responsible enough to take on the responsibility of raising someone.
How so? You're just making broad generalisations now. It's irresponsible to go around having safe sex? Because that's the first I've heard this. It must have just been printed in the New York Times yesterday!

Edit: Thank you, Spiff.