Originally posted by Duo
How the god is two major powers signing a treaty of non-intervention with a country that was an insanely large threat to the sovereignty of just about everyone even remotely similar to the people of a country voting in a different government due to the actions of anonymous die-hard extremists? Just because it involves the government withdrawing troops from another country (which is/was nowhere near as large a threat as the Third Reich?).

Comparing that to appeasement is insane. Conservatives seem to jump at everything and call it "appeasement", as if there's anything remotely like Nazi Germany to appease here.
I don't see what's so insane about it. I think you're just choosing not to consider my analogy and labeling it as "insane." And who said anything about conservatives?