View Poll Results: Live long in Prosper or May the Force be With you

Voters
44. You may not vote on this poll
  • Star Wars

    34 77.27%
  • Star Trek

    10 22.73%
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 56

Thread: Star Wars Vs Star Trek

  1. #1

    Default Star Wars Vs Star Trek

    Which one do you think is better?

    Side note, the Star Wars Clone Wars Mini series on Cartoon Network kicks ass!

  2. #2
    Jump In The Fi-yaaaaah! metCloud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Monkey Cage
    Posts
    336

    Default

    I only liked one Star Trek movie and didnt like the series. I like every Star Wars movie made, so I say Star Wars.
    I'm Metcloud and I approved this message

  3. #3
    Recognized Member TheAbominatrix's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Sacramento, California
    Posts
    6,838
    Contributions
    • Hosted Eyes on You

    Default

    Definitly Star Wars. I cant stand any of the Trek movies or the show.

  4. #4
    Mr. Encyclopedia Kirobaito's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    6,359

    Default

    I've tried watching Star Trek, and I find it to be so incredibly stupid. Star Wars is quite tasteful.

    **votes for the Force**

  5. #5
    Feel the Bern Administrator Del Murder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Oakland, California
    Posts
    41,604
    Articles
    6
    Blog Entries
    2
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight
    • Former Administrator
    • Hosted the Ciddies

    Default

    No brainer for me.

    The Clone Wars shows are ok. When they show them all together it's better, I can't really get into a five minute spot.

    Proud to be the Unofficial Secret Illegal Enforcer of Eyes on Final Fantasy!
    When I grow up, I want to go to Bovine Trump University! - Ralph Wiggum

  6. #6
    Eoff + Fabio = Win Lord Chainsaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Would you like a nice, strong massage?
    Posts
    931

    Default

    I think Rodenberry is better than Lucas, but I think Star Wars is better than Star Trek.

  7. #7
    *permanently smitten*
    A Vey Good Friend
    Calliope's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Sandbar of Defiance
    Posts
    5,752
    Blog Entries
    10

    Grin

    Clone Wars...shows?!

    WE ARE THE E E E E E EEEEEEEEEEEWOKS!

  8. #8
    Lumberjack Recognized Member RSL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    7,225
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    star trek sucks

  9. #9
    cyka blyat escobert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Rush B! NO STOP!
    Posts
    17,742
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    star wars.. no contest.

  10. #10
    ORANGE Dr Unne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Posts
    7,394
    Articles
    1
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Developer
    • Former Tech Admin

    Default

    I don't know what people see in Star Wars. The old movies were OK. The new movies are both terrible to the point where I think they're riding on the name of the franchise. Star Trek, on the other hand, is great. The series moreso than the movies, though some movies (KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAN) were good. It has characters who actually have fairly well-developed personalities, for one thing. And there's almost nothing I hate more than mixing fantasy with sci-fi. Leave fantasy alone. Swords + guns = MORONIC. People must learn this.

  11. #11
    *permanently smitten*
    A Vey Good Friend
    Calliope's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Sandbar of Defiance
    Posts
    5,752
    Blog Entries
    10

    Grin

    ...

  12. #12

    Default

    Star Trek.

    Star Wars is just light saber after light saber.

  13. #13

    Default

    Star Trek is all about the crew going on the ships transporter but it malfuntions and they wind up on some distant time or on some alien world, and they end up fighting off some giant aliens with large pole weapons!

  14. #14

    Default

    Star Wars is really based on action that's more reptitive than blinking an eye. None of the Star Wars movies I've seen made me interested in them because their lack of accurate science facts and pointless light-saber battles.

    Star Trek had more purpose than just cutting people in half with a light saber. It was more on exploration and a sense of purpose. Star Wars was just over-hyped drama that had HORRIBLE coreographed fights, mainly in the early movies in the 70's.

    Besides, Gene Roddenbery(however you spell it) and Issac Asimov together would shoot down anything John Lucas has in a second.

  15. #15
    Mr. Encyclopedia Kirobaito's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    6,359

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dingo_Jellybean
    Besides, Gene Roddenbery(however you spell it) and Issac Asimov together would shoot down anything John Lucas has in a second.
    Nah. I doubt Gene or Isaac can play any basketball whatsoever. They may be able to take John Lucas Jr., but not the younger point guard from Oklahoma State, John Lucas III.

    I'm pretty sure you mean George Lucas.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •