Quote Originally Posted by Omecle
It's quite contradicting, your posts that is, Clyde. You say they can't do this and can't do that with their FF games? Yet they have done whatever they wanted with their FF games (i.e. making one of them online), and they are making some great business from it. So what's your point? They made a sequal to an FF game, and they made some great business out of that. So what's your point?
This is so terribly utilitarian. Have they followed their high standards or are they pandering to the masses?

Quote Originally Posted by Omecle
your example isn't exactly right for this argument. The video game industry is a little different from your jewler's industry.
how? they're both selling top of the line valuable merchandise and square has seemed to change it, am I right? I never got a straight answer to my first post. Is this a break of tradition. Have they actually replaced FF with somthing different. not necesarraly bad, but is it significantly different. my question is if someone put out all the FF's in a row and sang that obnoxious sesame street song, "one of these things is not like the other" would everyone point to XI