I'm a little confused as to your point, forgive me. First you say religion and it's affiliated states of mind are dangerous to humanity because of their inconsistencies, but the only alternative you provide, science, cannot apply to all thoughts and ideas. I understand that part, but then you go back to say that science is bad because it's inconsistent and theoretical, and that's where the strength of metaphysics lay, a form of thought that by definition completely theoretical! I don't understand what you're arguing. Help!