evolution is utterly philosophical. It was made in the enlightenment firstly by a man who wanted to eliminate a need for God. I'm not talking about darwin, darwin popularized evolution, but it was created by the french (no supprise. QVID BONVS POTEST VENERE AB GAVLO) It disregared most empirical evidence. Firstly, life is complex. while matter always goes from a state of higher order to lower order, life can go from lower complexity to higher complexity, but with incresingly low probabilities. Scientists created the first amino acids in the laboratory 50 years ago, and touted it as the triumphant fact proving evolution (There are two articles in a science periodical this month hailing it as the pinnacle of science) but they know math and probabilities, and the chances of those amino acids coming together properly exceeds the scientific definition of impossible by 10^39750! that's a big number. secondly, scientist grudgingly admit when cornered that the fossil record seems to indicate a monsterous flood, not millions and millions of years of layers of sedament. I have seen proof that it could not have been over millions of years with my bare eyes: tree trunks moving up through millions of years of sediment. I defy you to show me a 100 million year old petrafied forest on earth today. and fossil record dating is based in circular reasoning anyway, the layers are dated by what animals are in them, the animals dated by their levels. also interesting is the fact that every woman has the same mitochondrial dna. without going into specifics the experiment which collected dna from every major ethnic group on earth means that all women, from an old sweedish woman to a native american to an arab to a swahili woman all come from one woman convieniently placed around 7500-6500 years ago. Science tends to prove the judeo-christian bible to be literally and word for word accurate wherever science can be applied.Originally Posted by Dr Unne
