Your not a Monetary economist then! The "presidents" policy has more than you may think in the growth of an economy - whether he personally makes it or Milton Friedman does.
What I was saying was that there are so many factors involved in the economy that the president's measures are often small and insignificant due to the excess of other factors. What the president does CAN have an effect on the economy, but more often than not its effect is overstated.

This is quite a good suggestion! But your founding fathers (who actually participated in battle unlike Bush) agreed on 8 years max. Why? I don't know their personal motivations...
No, actually they didn't. The amount of terms a president could have was unlimited for quite awhile, until later legislation limited it to one.