Quote Originally Posted by Snowman
if i did i may as well be a nazi.

Omnivores to nazis. if you just dont understand yet what it means for a life to be brutally murderd just for you to eat it...then no......but for those who do know and dont care, they are happy to watch thousands of innocent helpless pleding creatures be beaten or shot the same way the furr trade loves anal electricution and then they say "well they mean less than Us". the nazis happily rounded up whole familiys and generations, little children crying for their mothers and elderly women unable to walk and when they didnt shoot them they stripped them naked in the cold, chemically showerd them and as they huddled naked and helpless they were murderd. the nazis used their skin and bits to make books and lampshades and coats which are still in museums today.....much as leather is used....thus why omnivores or rather meateaters carry on the nazi and roman tradition for hatred and bloody murder. im trying to save lives and make them better.....they condemn them.
Last time I say this: Eating meat is not murder. You're consuming something that's already dead. Eating meat is not a thing like the Holocaust. We don't strip cows of their "dignity" by raping them or forcing them to dig useless ditches in the ground. The Nazis killed purely because they hated their victims. Animals are killed for food. You're saying it's unethical to kill animals would be just like us saying it's totally unethical to kill plants. Read Big D's post again, since I don't feel like repeating the things he said.

Comparing a chicken to a human being? If you were forced to make a choice to kill 5,000 chickens or 5,000 human babies, which would you choose? Would you have a hard time deciding? What if your own child was among the 5,000 babies?

You also talked about evolution. Well, plants, as well, are evolving. Say within... Oh 100 years, plants started making sounds of their own and could even wail in pain, what would you, or your children, eat then?