why do you torture us? Why?
Just my 2K.
why do you torture us? Why?
Just my 2K.
Last edited by UltimateSpamGrover; 08-25-2004 at 12:53 PM.
A fallen ally then a fallen enemy,
Falling allies then fallen enemies. (This could be something to do with FFX- people who aren't sent turning into fiends)
A fallen leader but not for long, (This could be about Cloud when he falls into the Lifestream and looses himself)
Three then fall but is one gone? (Could this have to do with Auron Jecht and Braska? They all kinda fall, though Auron only get's sent later....and so does Jecht....)
Four shall fall if four are there, ( I agree with whoever said this has to do with an FF where you have 4 chars in battle eg FF9)
Just who falls next and should we care?
*gives up in frustration!!!!*
Stay with me, until the end. Please.
Not until the end. Forever.
......Forever then.
Phoenix Ash I hope you die a slow, painful death. (just kidding)
Just my 2K
This is getting painful...*goes and tries to figure it out again...*
You know you've all been stuck on my riddles before, and you've seen the explanations, you should know I use punctuation to help a lot.
I say what I think. If you disagree, then that is up to you.
How about I just sidestep the whole figuring out which FFs, figure out which game line three is from, and then fit that to line 6 (assuming of course the pattern is a three-game cycle repeated twice)?
So since apparently line 3 is not Cloud from FFVII, and there are no other FFs with such a situation save FFIX and possibly FFVI (although it's arguable there's no real leader in FFVI), I'd go with Zidane from FFIX in Pandemonium, which means Garland falls next, and uh, we should care, because Garland was cool.
What did I say about punctuation? Come on PoD you know my riddles well enough to figure out what pattern I'm using.
Guess I'll give another clue. There is a VERY important reason I only used three FF's, and it isn't due to plot relations. Line 5 has been partly cracked, but it's a lot more specific than what's been got so far.
I say what I think. If you disagree, then that is up to you.
D'oh - didn't see that. That requires figuring out Line 4 or Line 5, which are weirder. :x_x:
*Is unsure as to whether you understood the pattern or not, but has faith*
You know you could stop trying to cheat and actually look at the whole riddle. I don't write pointless lines very often that I remember, in fact I was fairly tight on how much I wrote, I SHOULD have written more lines than I did if I was doing the riddle to it's full extent.
I say what I think. If you disagree, then that is up to you.
Write more lines, then!
Holy trout lines 5 and 6 could be referring to how you have four members in your party while Kain is jumping in the air, and he would be the person that falls next from the sky, as he's jumping. That's more specific than the other explanations given so far...
Lines 3 and 4 could refer to Cloud, Tifa, and Aeris all leaving the party in FFVII; Aeris permanently.
Lines 1 and 2 then, could refer to something in FFX, since the pattern would be 4-7-10, or rather, 10-7-4. The difference by three goes along with three different FFs. I hope the pattern is 10-10-7-7-4-4? :riiight:
So that would make my answer Kain, and yes, we should care, because Kain is awesome.
You're starting to go along the right lines of thinking, I don't want to add the other lines because they wouldn't work so well, but there should be more.
Two clues, first there is a VERY strict structure to how this riddle is written, no line is irrelevant or could be moved. Remember what I said, the reason I chose three FFs is not due to their plots, and line five was almost solved.
Another big clue is to pay attention to the exact wording of line two.
I say what I think. If you disagree, then that is up to you.
A fallen ally then a fallen enemy,
Falling allies then fallen enemies.
A fallen leader but not for long,
Three then fall but is one gone?
Four shall fall if four are there,
Just who falls next and should we care?
Do you mind if I put up ideas, even when I'm not having a stab at solving the riddle?
PoD, what you said about Kain is cool, and there's another char that does that-Freya.
The exact wording of line two is fallING allies and fallEN enemies, right? So maybe your talking about the two charactes that jump in battle, later to land on their foes? So maybe line two refers to Kain, Freya, and anyone else who does that kinda stuff.
EDIT: Is this riddle about the different stlyes of attack FF characters have? Like the first line could be about someone who Ko's themself to take out an enemy?
Stay with me, until the end. Please.
Not until the end. Forever.
......Forever then.
I give, see you all next year
Just my 2K
Sorry Mossy, excellent thinking, but no. You did well with line two but made the wrong interpretation.
Okay I'll give a clue, the FFs involved are consecutive, and that's very important in getting the answer. Another clue is while the lines are linked, each line is about something different.
I say what I think. If you disagree, then that is up to you.
Having a stab in the dark here and posting a few ideas, bear with me
Is line one suggesting that a fallen ally become a fallen enemy later on?
Falling allies then fallen enemies. I have always thought this line refered to Galbadia garden. It was falling because Galbadia and the Sorceress wanted to use and abuse it. There fallen enemies due to the battle between the two gardens. There were enemies after Seifer and the galbadians soldiers took it over and started ramming Balamb. And they fell because they lost.
I'm still stuck on the rest
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
