You decide.
Quantity
Quality
You decide.
I dremt I was a moron, then I woke up and I was still a moron.
Um... q&q of what? That is the question?
Stop the Earth! I want to get out!...
Just in general, oh and btw I picked quality.
I dremt I was a moron, then I woke up and I was still a moron.
Depends what it is actually. Overall, I guess quality is the bigger winner, but in some cases quantity could be just as well![]()
Quality is better than Quantity... Go figure.
I dunno, 10 $100 bills are better than 1 "Quality" $100 bill...
edit: Here's a fun question: Provide a general defintion for quality.
8 entries found for quality.
qual·i·ty ( P ) Pronunciation Key (kwl-t)
n. pl. qual·i·ties
An inherent or distinguishing characteristic; a property.
A personal trait, especially a character trait: “The most vital quality a soldier can possess is self-confidence” (George S. Patton).
Essential character; nature: “The quality of mercy is not strain'd” (Shakespeare).
Superiority of kind: an intellect of unquestioned quality.
Degree or grade of excellence: yard goods of low quality.
High social position.
Those in a high social position.
Music. Timbre, as determined by harmonics: a voice with a distinctive metallic quality.
Linguistics. The character of a vowel sound determined by the size and shape of the oral cavity and the amount of resonance with which the sound is produced.
Logic. The positive or negative character of a proposition.
adj.
Having a high degree of excellence: the importance of quality health care.
Word/s.
Well said
I dremt I was a moron, then I woke up and I was still a moron.
Quality for:
~Car's
~Women
~Video games
~Some foods
Quantity for:
~Money
~Other foods
This question is way too open.
Only the best.
Proud to be the Unofficial Secret Illegal Enforcer of Eyes on Final Fantasy!
When I grow up, I want to go toBovineTrump University! - Ralph Wiggum
Well, it doesn't become very interesting if you're not bright enough to think of one on your own, does it now?
Del: What's best? So on and so forth. I stipulate in all specific cases you can concretely tie quality to certain objective aspects of the case, but not in a general case - there's no definite intercase correlation.
Well it depends. Lets say 100 weakly armed soldiers (quantity) attacked 45 well armed soldiers (quality) fought, the 45 would win because even though they r outnumbered, they have better armmanets, therefore, could do more things with it, long range, short range, automatic, semi-auto, one shot, all depeneds, so i put quality
EDIT-- Look at LOTR Two Towers, Helms Deep. The elves had better quality weapons, along with the humans, therefore beating the quantity of the Uraki
*Uruk-Hai
quantity in regards to number of penguins.
quality in regards to healthy penguins.
eg., I'd take one healthy penguin over 100 penguins infected with syphilis. because after a short time, those 100 penguins would die.
It really depends on what. What would I rather have, 1 FF7 or 3 FF8s? Well, I'd rather have 3 FF8s, so I could pawn two of them and buy me an FF7. *nod*
I picked quality, though, and I just now thought of that analogy.
Quality.