How can staff be consistent if most of the mods do their own thing and rarely communicate? I'm sure it may have been brought up, but the staff is rarely divided over anything nowadays. I never really liked the auto-ban for pics not exactly porn, but in some cases, yes, it may be necessary. But you shouldn't be banning a good member just for posting an inappropriate picture, while some can get away with more destructive things, like flaming someone, or saying the f-word by avoiding the censor.Originally Posted by Yamaneko
Sure, if the picture was really intended, the ban can be justified. However most people banned for posting an picture on the line of inappropriateness, I find that a little wrong. Why not warn them if someone who can get away with saying the f-word avoiding the censor gets a warning?
