I've long since disagreed with EoFF's "quick-ban" policy, which basically gives free reign for any staff member to ban anyone for anything if they think it should be done. Which inevitably leaves to people being treated differently. Which leads to hostility from members that were banned for lighter offences than other people had done and got off with a warning.
In this instance, I think it would be FAR better to just delete the picture, warn the member, and then have a quick discussion in staff(which can be something as simple and quick and easy as IMing other staffers) as to whether ban or not.
But yeah. I didn't get anywhere last year; I doubt I'll be listened to now.
