Alright, I guess it's safe to speak. And to avoid confrontation, I'll keep my thought in a nut-shell.

As long as there isn't a corruptive leader, Communism works. As seen with Stalin, the people loved him, he was a great ruler in terms of how he ruled, but what he did (the Great Purge), didn't leave him with the best image. He killed millions, many for no reason at all; and he was also considered by many to be mentally unstable.

Personally, I thought Lenin was a much better ruler, and always will be. Even though Socialism didn't work, Lenin still did a lot for Russia during the revolution. I think the main problem is that people overlook Communism and judge it by what happened in Cuba, China, and Russia (from Stalin forward).

So if there is a completely stable ruler, Communism is possibly one of the better systems of government. IMHO, Democracy is also one of the most corruptive forms of government. But then again I was also raised in some bad conditions, and communism appeals to me more. Everyone is equal in front of the state, there are rich or poor people, everyone is guaranteed a job. It seems more logical. Granted I'm in a higher class now than I was when I grew up, but I still find Communism more appealing.