why dont they.

[nik0tine]

Then what are they? There all innocent? None of them are guilty?

none of them have been proven guilty, therefore they are ALL innocent... at least i thought that was the American way but ive been having some doubts lately...

Terrorists are the same if they be from Afghanistan or Iraq.

Iraq had no ties to al'queda. i knew this from teh begining, you knew this from teh begining. its common knowledge. facts just dont matter anymore because george bush can make up his own facts and everyone buys them. oh yeah btw, in WW2 the after teh french were taken over by the germans, the french rebels would often times go into cafe's where german soldiers were off duty at having a good time and they woudl bring in their machine guns and kill them, then run off? and of course this was ok because they were our allies and the germans were the enemy. do you know what that woudl be called today?? yeah tahts right, terrorism. during the american revolution one of the founding fathers, i think it was john adams, set up a bunch of different groups of rebels to destroy british things and kill british soldier. much like the boston tea party. these groups would be called cells today and they would also be considered terrorists. do you think american revolutionaries should have been treated like animals? they were doing the same things as the 'terrorists' of today.