Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 52

Thread: 'Michael Moore Is A Big Fat Stupid White Man'

  1. #1
    -=Hentai School Girl=- Fuzakeru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    i liek leve in huose
    Posts
    2,644

    Default 'Michael Moore Is A Big Fat Stupid White Man'

    My opinion on Micahel Moore is less than appealing and I'm sure everyone knows how I feel so I'll skip MY rant about the man himself and post an article I just ran across that I found amusing.

    Book: 'Michael Moore Is A Big Fat Stupid White Man'
    NewsMax.com
    Thursday, June 24, 2004

    A just released book takes on Michael Moore as never before. Its title screams: “Michael Moore Is A Big Fat Stupid White Man.”
    And surprisingly, this book has been published by the same publisher who gave us Michael Moore’s own runaway bestseller “Stupid White Men.”Apparently, more than a few people want to take revenge on Michael Moore and the timing couldn’t be better – with the release this week of his “documentary” attack piece on George Bush - Fahrenheit 9/11.

    Moore is so terrified by his detractors he claims that he has already hired a cabal of lawyers. He says he will sue Bush supporters who he thinks may be preparing to slander him.

    Moore's hypocrisy is obvious. Slate editor Jack Shafer says “Moore's hysterical, empty threats" to sue critics of his latest schlockumentary shows that he "appears to believe in free speech only for himself."

    One possible target for Moore’s lawyers may be the publisher of his own book.

    Moore’s one time publisher, ReganBooks, is out with a disturbing yet comical book that dismantles every cog of that propaganda machine marketed as Michael Moore.

    David T. Hardy and Jason Clarke's "Michael Moore Is A Big Fat Stupid White Man" begins by unearthing his phony roots and goes right up to his latest "documentary."


    Meet the Flint-drone: Everybody knows Moore is a blue-collar guy from Flint, Mich., right? That's how he always sells himself.

    In reality, he was born and raised in the wealthy, lily-white town of Davison, Mich, the authors reveal. No wonder the clown prince of self-loathing developed such a complex about hating rich, stupid white males.


    In a letter to Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times last year, Moore still listed his town as Flint. In fact, despite his proclamations that "capitalism is a sin" and "an evil system," he lives in a $1.9 million apartment in Manhattan and enjoys a $1.2 million summer home on Torch Lake in Michigan.


    Does not play well with others: Moore can't get along even with his fellow travelers.

    Hardy and Clarke disclose how the radical magazine Mother Jones fired the "arbitrary" and "suspicious" Moore; how he started his feud with his replacement, David Talbot, who later founded Salon; how Ralph Nader's organization fired Moore; how he attacked Pauline Kael, Harlan Jacobson and other prominent critics who exposed the deceits of his schlockumentaries; how he lost a lawsuit for betraying fellow lefty activist Larry Stecco in "Roger & Me," etc.


    Nor can the elitist Moore tolerate those lowly working classes and students he claims to represent.

    "Big Fat Stupid White Man" gives details of how he abused the staff during a speaking engagement at London's Roundhouse Theater; how he castigated a student who dared question his hefty speaking fee; how he attacked a young documentary maker who had the nerve to give him a taste of the "Roger & Me" treatment, and so forth.

    And don't forget his amusingly shrill denunciation of those awful blue-collar crewmen who, unlike his fellow multimillionaires in Hollywood’s left, booed him during his tirade at the Oscars.

    The book presents one example after another, alternating between frightening and hilarious, to make a brilliant case for Moore having Narcissistic Personality Disorder.


    Then there's his feud with his former publisher, HarperCollins subsidiary ReganBooks, which gave us his best seller “Stupid White Men” and now brings us “Michael Moore Is A Big Fat Stupid White Man.”

    ReganBooks, he claims, tried "to censor me and the things I wanted to say. They insisted I rewrite up to 50 percent of the book and that I remove sections that they found offensive to our leader, Mr. Bush." The company plotted "to 'pulp' and recycle all 50,000 copies of my book that were gathering dust in a warehouse," he insists.

    However, ReganBooks issued a statement to NewsMax.com contradicting these allegations:

    "Originally scheduled for release on September 11, 2001, the book was delayed by mutual agreement between author and publisher after the events of that day. Despite erroneous reports that have appeared in the press, the publisher never attempted to censor the book on partisan grounds, though the publisher and author did discuss replacing the original version of the book with an updated version to address the post-9/11 world. Ultimately, the decision was made to release the book in its original form, and it went on to become a huge success for both the publisher and the author. ReganBooks has since declined to exercise its option to publish another book by Mr. Moore."


    After all, Moore and other members of the left-wing thought police can't bear a commitment to diversity of ideas.

    Judith Regan, president and publisher of ReganBooks, noted that her company had produced books by Howard Stern and Moore as well as Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh.

    "As publishers, we have an obligation to publish a wide range of ideas, opinions, and perspectives," she said in a statement issued to NewsMax. "Our job is to publish voices on the left, on the right, and everywhere in between – to provide a broad range of opinion.”

    "We agree with Michael Moore that free expression is one of our most important human rights," Regan said, "and publishing widely and freely is the only way to honor that tradition."


    Unfortunately, Moore fights his critics' right to free expression, as Slate's Shafer noted and as Hardy and Clarke document at length.


    Howlers in 'Columbine': Some of the distortions and falsehoods that plague the movie "Bowling for Columbine" are already well known, but Hardy and Clarke add details and reveal new whoppers.


    Moore claims that National Rifle Association taunted the Denver area and the nation by holding "a large pro-gun rally" only days after the killings at Columbine High School.
    In reality, the annual meeting had been planned well in advance, was required by law, could not have been changed in time to another city, and was stripped of all rallies and ceremony in deference to the community.


    The movie depicts Charlton Heston as making his famous "cold, dead hands speech" in Denver.
    In reality, the remarks came a year later in Charlotte, N.C., and Moore spliced bits of footage from that and another speech for maximum distortion. "It is a lie, a fraud, and a few other things," Hardy and Clarke write.


    The fantasy film claims that Heston exploited a school shooting in Mount Morris, Mich., by staging another "big pro-gun rally" in October 2002.
    In reality, Heston’s appearance came eight months after the shooting, at a get-out-the-vote event in nearby Flint. Others campaigning in the area around that time included Al Gore, George W. Bush … and Moore himself, touting Ralph Nader.

    The authors conclude: "Bowling for Columbine has less documentary value than the average Bugs Bunny cartoon. You see Heston giving a speech – but it's doctored. You see history – but unconnected facts are given a particular Moorewellian spin. You hear that a factory is making weapons of mass destruction – actually, it's building satellite launch platforms. You're led to believe that a rally was a response to a shooting, but it turns out it was eight months later, in anticipation of an election. You watch a Bush-Quayle campaign ad, but in reality it was an ad Moore himself assembled."


    'Stupid' is as stupid does: Hardy and Clarke dissect "Stupid White Men" and "Dude, Where’s My Country?" along with the latter's celluloid ugly stepchild, Fahrenheit 9/11, to delve into the heart of Moore's pathology. A few highlights:


    Moore harps on his portrayal of America as a "nation of idiots" (i.e., people who disagree with him) and illiterates.
    In reality, the "statistics" he offers indicating widespread illiteracy include two sizeable groups: immigrants who are often fluent in other languages but not English, and the blind and visually impaired.


    Moore, who after all graduated from high school, delights in ridiculing his countrymen’s poor grasp of geography. "The dumbest Brit here is smarter than the smartest American," he snickers to an audience in London.
    But Moore chooses not to add an important fact: young adults worldwide performed badly on the National Geographic survey he so selectively cites.


    He claims that Florida wrongly disenfranchised thousands of pro-Democrat criminals in the 2000 election. "Thirty-one percent of all black men in Florida" are felons, in his paranoid fantasy world. (No wonder this limousine liberal travels in such exclusive circles.)
    In reality, the Miami Herald showed that Democrat-run counties violated state law and let the overwhelmingly Democrat felons vote illegally – more than 2,000 votes, most of which went to Gore.


    Most importantly, "Michael Moore Is a Big Fat Stupid White Man" refutes Moore's wild attempts to implicate the president in 9/11. Every American should read these chapters. They are too detailed to summarize here, but one example will demonstrate this book's importance.

    Moore claims President Bush invaded Afghanistan and toppled the Taliban so he could get an oil pipeline built. You've probably heard others parrot this allegation. A master of propaganda knows that if you repeat a lie often enough, people start to believe it.


    In reality, Bush had supported Enron's plan to run pipes under the Caspian Sea and avoid Afghanistan. "Clinton was the one backing the rival Unocal plan to put them through Afghanistan," Hardy and Clarke observe.

    Inspiration to terrorists: Moore's favorite claim: “THERE … IS … NO … TERRORIST … THREAT!" If so, why do terrorists take succor from him?

    The most damning indictment of Moore in "Big Fat Stupid White Man": the salute offered by Imam Samudra, leader of the Muslim terrorist bombers who murdered 202 people, mostly Australians and other tourists, two years ago at Paddy's nightclub in Bali.

    "I saw lots of whiteys dancing and lots of whiteys drinking there," Samudra told Indonesian police. The authors note, "It was 'Kill Whitey' (to quote a chapter heading in Stupid White Men) with a vengeance."


    Samudra's attorney Qaidar Faisal concluded his defense by praising the Taliban and quoting from "anti-western texts" including Moore's "Stupid White Men."


    Despite all the appalling revelations in "Michael Moore Is A Big Fat Stupid White Man," it's hard to finish the book without feeling pity for this man.

    Had he used his talents to make actual documentaries and write books devoid of distortion and mendacity, he could have offered a useful critique of the Bush administration's flaws.

    Instead, fueled by a narcissism that springs from hatred of self and others, he mangles reality to dupe the uninformed, delight the blame-America-first crowd and even inspire terrorists.

    He concentrates his venom on one politician and one party but damages a nation.

    "Michael Moore Is A Big Fat Stupid White Man" marks a confident step in undoing his damage.
    Do you Wanna Build a Snowman?

    -= It doesn't have to be a snowman... =-

  2. #2

    Default

    You call Moore a hypocrite, and yet you support Limbaugh?

    Anyway, sounds interesting. Think I'll read it.
    lol signature

  3. #3
    -=Hentai School Girl=- Fuzakeru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    i liek leve in huose
    Posts
    2,644

    Default

    I support a lot of Limbaugh's opinions, yes. ^_^- Just don't let that aspect about me ( that and my Moore disliking ) cloud your judgement on me. I am a 'rabid conservative' yes but that doesn't make me closed minded. A lot of people will probably discredit this article based on the fact that it's from Newsmax.com ( a clear Conservatic/Republican site ) Nonetheless, if you support Moore it'll interest you to know who he's going against with this book and the documentray "Michael Moore HATES America."
    -sage nod-
    Do you Wanna Build a Snowman?

    -= It doesn't have to be a snowman... =-

  4. #4

    Default

    Sounds good. I'm always open to new ideas. Even though I agree with him that American's are stupid, and I'm not a big fan of the country meself.

    Its good to see you're open minded. A good example of which is you not flaming me as I expected after my taunt about Limbaugh. Good show.
    lol signature

  5. #5

    Default

    Sue anybody who makes fun of him ? Hey if Bush did that he'd be a millionare... Thats 'Freedom of Speech' for you...


    THERE IS NO TERRORIST THREAT!
    And I take it if he were president he wouldnt have the leader ship to do somthing about it, rather then living in a dream world, thinking battling terrorism is a unwinable battle. Its that pessimist thinking that doesnt bring us anywhere.

  6. #6
    -=Hentai School Girl=- Fuzakeru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    i liek leve in huose
    Posts
    2,644

    Default

    "And surprisingly, this book has been published by the same publisher who gave us Michael Moore’s own runaway bestseller “Stupid White Men.”
    This brings a smile to my face. Anyone else? XD!

    Its good to see you're open minded. A good example of which is you not flaming me as I expected after my taunt about Limbaugh. Good show.
    Thank you. Just because you don't like Limbaugh that doesn't mean you are insulting me. ^_^- And it's good to know that you took the time to read the article instead of getting huffy and flaming ME.

    Hey if Bush did that he'd be a millionare...
    A LOT of people would be millionares . . . -sage nods-
    Do you Wanna Build a Snowman?

    -= It doesn't have to be a snowman... =-

  7. #7

    Default

    The same can easily be said about Rush. Espeially when he's a racist and was addicted to painkillers, which Moore is/has been guitly of neither. *snicker*

  8. #8
    Unpostmodernizeable Shadow Nexus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Barcino, Hispania
    Posts
    987

    Default

    Ah, so Michael Moore contradicts himself. Yet everyone does.

    About the whole manipulation this article claims to unveil, well, I don't know, I have the same reasons to believe this than I have to believe Moore: None. Maybe it's true that Moore did do that to the Heston speech, so then...why didn't the actor sue him? I think he should have a right to do so. And still, if that is in fact true, well...bad work. It still dosen't invalidate the points he does in that documentary.

  9. #9
    -=Hentai School Girl=- Fuzakeru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    i liek leve in huose
    Posts
    2,644

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Graves
    The same can easily be said about Rush. Espeially when he's a racist and was addicted to painkillers, which Moore is/has been guitly of neither. *snicker*
    -points her finger at menacingly then shakes her head- I won't retaliate. I shall just shut up and . . . nod my head and smile. -seeths-
    Do you Wanna Build a Snowman?

    -= It doesn't have to be a snowman... =-

  10. #10

    Default

    Rush Limbaugh is a fat, bloated, doping hypocrite. I'm glad his stupid talkshow isn't aired in my media market. But as for Michael Moore...

    ...I noticed you said you're a diehard Republican(well, you have to be if you support Bush). One thing you seem to assume about Michael Moore, from what I've seen, is that he seems anti-Republican and goes against your views. I'm pretty sure that's one of the roots of your hatred for Michael Moore.

    The majority of the US shares your opinion. See, you keep posting what others think of him...but who cares? Your rants have been nothing more than "Michael Moore is fat and needs to die" or you just agree with anyone who bashes Michael Moore.

    What people don't understand is that Michael Moore is more unAmerican than anti-American. The majority of the media itself has had a US education, and one thing about education...no matter where it is, is that education teaches and preaches patriotism. The media is suppose to be this unbiased news outlet, yet they broadcast him in a negative tone.

    For example, my local news affiliate, FOX 5, reports about Farenheit 911 and only mentions how much criticism it has received. You call that unbiased? That's BS.

    What I hate about Michael Moore bashers is that they always have to quote everyone else.

    I do agree, to some degree, that many Americans are dumb. Probably not common sense dumb, but close-minded dumb. This country is so beleagered in its own patriotism that anything negatively said about this country is said to be blasphemous. The politicians elected in this country might hold degrees from high institutions(like Bush), but many of them are helpless without their advisors(like Bush). I'm not anti-Republican, I just think Bush is a complete moron who barely got his way to his degree. John McCain is a much better republican and better educated. Even many democrats agree with that one.

    The reason why I hate all these stupid quoting articles is that they are all biased. And of all places, why the hell did you quote this article from Newsmax? The site is clearly Republican-favored. If you're going to quote, quote from an unbiased source, otherwise your statements look like crap.

  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dingo_Jellybean
    What people don't understand is that Michael Moore is more unAmerican than anti-American.
    I agree with everything else, but I don't think he's un-american. He's questioning the way the current government is run, and he's doing what america was founded on. He's just using his right of free speech to do worthy cause. Not enough people question the government, I don't think.

  12. #12
    Sky Blue Sky Recognized Member Trumpet Thief's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Cutest Place in the World
    Posts
    4,917
    Contributions
    • Contributions to Eizon project

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dingo_Jellybean
    Rush Limbaugh is a fat, bloated, doping hypocrite. I'm glad his stupid talkshow isn't aired in my media market.

  13. #13
    -=Hentai School Girl=- Fuzakeru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    i liek leve in huose
    Posts
    2,644

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dingo_Jellybean
    One thing you seem to assume about Michael Moore, from what I've seen, is that he seems anti-Republican and goes against your views. I'm pretty sure that's one of the roots of your hatred for Michael Moore.
    My hatred for Michael Moore is not just because he doesn't share my personal opinion. Hell, if you want to look at it that way - A LOT of people don't share my opinion but I don't hate them. I like Limbaugh and you don't . . . I don't hate you.

    Your rants have been nothing more than "Michael Moore is fat and needs to die" or you just agree with anyone who bashes Michael Moore.
    No. There are plenty of statements made that I don't agree with. I don't think he's the devil and I never said based my dislike of him because he's fat and needs to die ( I don't wish death upon anyway but I know where you were coming from ). The things he's said about the American public pisses me off. His general cocky attitude angers me off. The fact that he pokes fun at the heros on Flight 93 ( something that I refuse to let go ) makes me dislike him further.

    The media is suppose to be this unbiased news outlet, yet they broadcast him in a negative tone.
    From what I've seen the majority of the news outlet has a liberal standpoint but I suppose that's just one's own perspective.

    What I hate about Michael Moore bashers is that they always have to quote everyone else.
    I was posting an article I had read on one of the sites I go to because I found the topic interesting and I found what they had to say about Michael Moore interesting. I understand the atricle bashes him a lot and if that upsets you I'm sorry. I've also seen many articles bashing Bush . . .

    The reason why I hate all these stupid quoting articles is that they are all biased. And of all places, why the hell did you quote this article from Newsmax? The site is clearly Republican-favored.
    I post from this particular news article from a strictly conservative website because I agree with what they say. I've been a fan of that site for quite some time.

    If you're going to quote, quote from an unbiased source, otherwise your statements look like crap.
    Then I guess they look like crap to you. I figured it better to post an article that I was reading rather than coming in here and saying, "Look! There's a book that calls Michael More fat and stupid!! I don't like him but I have no personal reason to cause I just quote what others say!" However, I guess that's how it came across from what you've said and I'm sorry if you perceived it that way.

    You know, this is why I stay away from topics like this usually.
    Do you Wanna Build a Snowman?

    -= It doesn't have to be a snowman... =-

  14. #14

    Default

    NewsMax is clearly Republican-favored...why?

    Those "Support Bush" ads all over the site is one clue. So quoting from them is never reliable.

  15. #15
    -=Hentai School Girl=- Fuzakeru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    i liek leve in huose
    Posts
    2,644

    Default

    Just because the page supports Bush does not make the information unreliable. So what if it is Republican-favored?
    Do you Wanna Build a Snowman?

    -= It doesn't have to be a snowman... =-

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •