lol. this guy's got it dead on man.Originally Posted by Mr. Graves
and divinity... i like him too, but there is no need to yell...
lol. this guy's got it dead on man.Originally Posted by Mr. Graves
and divinity... i like him too, but there is no need to yell...
i allways cosidered eating to be americas most honed skill.
Your sig is too hilarious and witty, thus i have removed it to protect the minds of all forum goers
-The allways inspiring leeza
The last thing I need is the lard-ass responsible for Roger & Me to tell me how to vote. He's got more chins than Chinatown.
Whether you love Michael Moore's work or you hate it, the fact is that it has served its purpose already: Mucho ticket sales at the box office, and an increased public awareness of the issues which are important to him. Imagine what our political debates would be like had Michael Moore never made Fahrenheit 9/11 or Bowling For Columbine!Originally Posted by Fuzakeru
No matter which side of any given issue you take, you should at least give due credit to the person (or group) that sparked the debate in the first place!
Sure, Michael Moore's films are one-sided! Bill O'Reilly's political commentary is one-sided as well. However, I respect the opinons of both of those people (and others), as well as their right to voice those opinions, regardless of whether I agree or disagree.
Personally, I consider myself a political independent (lowercase "i"--not the "Independent" party). I agree with some of the Republicans' positions (for example, the legislation to prevent frivolous malpractice lawsuits), but I agree with the Democrats on a few things as well (privatizing Social Security would defeat the purpose of the system).
Simply stating that you agree with any one person or group (even worse) on every issue is an open display of your ignorance. I suggest that you learn to think for yourself.
The little purple man with the magical staff...
CHECK OUT MY FF1 PC REMAKE--GET IT HERE!!
This thread is over five months old. Please don't revive old threads.