Yes, I do understand that, and I happen to agree. My sister-in-law has a two year old (she's 16 now) and honestly it hasn't made her grow up much. I was just making the points that you didn't seem to understand what nik0tine was saying, and that nobody really knows if the teacher really did have sex with her student. I believe very strongly in "innocent until proven guilty". But speaking in hypothetical terms (ie the kid isn't just telling stories to get the attention), either way the teacher is guilty, but not completely at fault. If she came on to him, he also had the chance to say no. Now imagine if the situation was reversed though. What if it was a male 23-year old teacher that came on a 14-year old female student? Where a 14-year old boy gets a "cool" reputation, a 14-year old girl would end up with the reputation of being a slut. Or she would have to say that the teacher forced himself on her, which would make him a rapist.
