If that country acts against what you believe in and threatens, and you think you have the ability to harm it... by all means, do.Hey, War Angel, if a country has WMD, supports terrorism and ilegitimate goverments and has imperialistic external politics policies, should we kinda...bomb it?
When fighting monsters, be wary not to become one yourself... when gazing into the abyss, bear in mind that the abyss also gazes into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche
The rightful owner of this Ciddie can kiss my arse! :P
*grabs a coin*Originally Posted by War Angel
Head USA, tails France.
Hey, if you think you can defeat either... go for it. You know the USA defends itself... I dunno about the other one. :P
When fighting monsters, be wary not to become one yourself... when gazing into the abyss, bear in mind that the abyss also gazes into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche
The rightful owner of this Ciddie can kiss my arse! :P
Unlike Iraq, France DOES have nuclear capabilites.
EDIT:
This is for a good cause.
Last edited by Nait; 07-31-2004 at 09:16 PM.
Although I have yet to see Farenheit 9/11, I do agree with some of the points offered by Michael Moore in his first documentary "Bowling for Columbine".
What really got to me though was that "What a Wonderful World" video.
Well something else that is just my opinion is that if US is against real threats, then shouldn't they be aiming at some other countries, rather than Iraq?
You mean China? No, we wouldn't do that. We are far to afraid to lose a war.
Same goes for North Korea. Except we're more afraid that they'll shoot back, period.
Funny, a post about a Bush-basher ended being a Bish-bashing post.
Pfft. my only concern about N. Korea is the 37,000 troops we have a few miles away from the border. Other than that i think it'd be a cake walk to have 24 hour bombing runs and destroy anything in the sky that doesnt have a US flag on the side. As long as China doesnt get involved like they did last time, there would be much massacre.
That's what is keeping N. Korea safe for now, they know the USA can't really do much against them without getting China involved, and, while the USA would most likely win, the cost would be heavy: on the field, in terms of equipment and men, in the nearby territories, if China uses its own nuclear capabilities (S. Korea, Taiwan, Japan), and last but not least, they'd have to commit the troops stationed in Western Europe, leaving it quite defenseless.
SN: we're no threat, except maybe to Spain and Canada, 'cause we have no real army
And then there is Death
O_OSN: we're no threat, except maybe to Spain and Canada, 'cause we have no real army
But I live in Spain.
OK, prepare to die.
*grabs a slingshot*
Great Spanish technology.
After watching Fahrenheit 9/11 today i can't imagine how anyone could after seeing the movie still think the war on Iraq was a good idea. Well, anyone who won't be directly profiting from Iraq's oil supply, anyway.
After watching Fahrenheit 9/11 today i can't imagine how anyone could after seeing the movie still think the war on Iraq was a good idea. Well, anyone who won't be directly profiting from Iraq's oil supply, anyway.
Finally saw it today... it said most of what i'd been saying all along, and some i didnt say. But i agree with u.
michael moore is a lying bastard. farenheit 9/11 was a movie full of lies. it's not a documentary, for god sakes! what moore did was put everything out of context and alter everything to make it look like pure truth, but hell, it's just the opposite from that. moore hates america, and he plans to get everyone to hate america with his horrible movie.
...please don't beat me up... my friends have done cruel things to me because i'm not a liberal... *runs away*
hes a little bit of both. Sometimes some of the things he says make perfect sense, (watch "Roger & Me") but then again, some of the things he challenges he doesn't provide answers to his own questions. He can dish it out but he can't answer his own questions which makes me wonder if he really does look at this from the POV of the government. The solutions that they come up with are the solutions that they think suit the situation best, he has questioned their solutions and they provide the answers to their judgement, yet when he complains about them, he fails to provide a solution of his own.
BURGLEFICKLE!
Posting Permissions
