who will be the next Iraq?

this is sort of a hyperthetical question cause i hope BUSH wont get in another term.

but if the worst happens and he does, what will his next target 2 invade be? could he possibly risk a War with countries that DO have WMD, like North Korea? or maybe Iran? Sudan?(yeah right). or maybe he will actually quit invading countries after the Iraq disaster.

what do u ppl in the US in the know think his next step to world domination be?( ok i,m not really sounding serious but i am serious, and would really appreciate serious replys, even if u r pro-Bush and think my anti-Bush feelings are stuiped).

I think the next country is probably going to be Iran. There is already talk about how the Iranians are trying to build WMD's. There is no way we would attack North Korea because they would whoop our ass. It would just be another Vietnam, we'd go in there, lose a few lives and the public would turn against it and that would be the end of it. Again, I imagine Iran is next, as Bush really isn't intent on conquering the world, only the middle east.

chaos: Iran...

Rubedo: Then Syria. I do not think he will fight countries that are actually a threat to the world.

I agree with that statement.

He has never said anything abut "invading" another country. And why would N. Korea kick our ass? We have the best military in the world. And we weren't really beat in nam we just left because everyone was pissed we were there.

Exactly. Everyone would be pissed if we were in North Korea. To many lives would be lost and to many people would turn against the war. The American people seem to be able to agree with a war one minute, then protest it the next. Im sure you saw how it was even with Iraq. Just a few soldiers would die and that week the support for the war would go down. Then when everything seemed to be going good it would go back up. Pathetic in my opinion. But if we invaded N. Korea to many people would die and the American people would explode, even though they probably supported the whole thing in the first place. It would be even more disastrous if China got involved... That's probably another reason why we wouldn't go to war with North Korea.

I don't think it will be anyone. I seriously doubt the Senate would allow such an act again. Please don't forget that it isn't just the President's decision. There I've said my peace...I won't get involved in these conversations anymore.

Why won't you get in these conversations anymore?

and in my opinion, the senate would vote for another war. They know we arent fighting over WMD's or terrorism or freedom or any of that crap. They know how it will be beneficial to the U.S. in the long run economically.

Thats true. It's not just the President that declares war the senate must pass it. ANd I agree that it would be stupid to invade N. Korea because china would most likely get involved. I agree with you nik0tine that the US population needs to grow up and stick by one thing instead of being so wishy washy. I think we should support our troops and not give them a hard time liek what happend in nam. All they're doing is there job. And half the people in nam were drafted so it's not liek they had a choice. I'm gettign quite sick of being in the US not because of the government but the people. They just seem so petty and self centered.

I agree with every thing you said there, escobar.

My money's on France.

Originally Posted by princeofdarknez

My money's on (SPOILER)France.

That's a bad word. not to mention unpatriotic!

Yeah, I respect the hell outta those guys over there in Iraq. Man nobody knows what war is like except those guys.
Sorry Nik0tine, it's just something I don't like talking about. *Bans Himslef from these types of threads...is just tired of hearing about it*

yeah, i respect them, but at the same time i can't stand alot of them. I know that they are all good people however. My cousin recently volunteered to go to Iraq. He's just like most other soldiers, or people for that matter. just a great guy. again though, i find it hard to respect what them for what they are doing over there. I jsut do. However, i know that as people, most of them are fine individuals and i respect that. It's hard to judge a book by its cover, so i guess that's why we should always be civil, even if we find what they are doing to be deplorable.

This is certainly a slippery question as it all hings on who exactly is in the White House come next term. In my opinion, Saudi Arabia HAS to be the next logical place to clean out if we really want to make a difference in terrorism. Yet, the chances of that occurring during any Bush Administration are slim to none with slim leaving the building already.

That being said, I think that if and when new news about Osama, (remember him?) surfaces, such as where he might be now, the USA will invade their next. My money is he's somewhere in Pakistan, but who knows really?

Take care all.