Bush. I'd rather have a leader that'll do what he thinks is right, against all opposition, even if it later proves to be the wrong thing to do. Bush does a lot of things I disagree with; that lots of people disagree with, actually, but he thinks he's doing the right thing, and doesn't let naysayers stop him from trying. Kerry seems the type that wouldn't do what he thinks is right, if he thought the right thing to do was unpopular. I vote for leaders that I think make decisions better than me, not for leaders that fall back on me for big decisions. The congress can veto any Bush action they deem inappropriate. They can't give Kerry a spine. Further, our government is supposed to be made up of three independent branches. As far as I'm concerned, a vote for Kerry is like electing Congress for president. You'd only have two real branches of government.
