For BushOriginally Posted by The Captain
![]()
For BushOriginally Posted by The Captain
![]()
Again, you forgot about the aliens. I'm telling you, love, it's not a conspiracy theory without the aliens!We all know that The Man himself is Jewish. Why do you think Presidential candidates cannot carry debates without mentioning the security of Israel, or the government passing a worldwide anti-semitism law which will be enforced by American taxpayers? They have certain obligations they must adhere to, right...
When fighting monsters, be wary not to become one yourself... when gazing into the abyss, bear in mind that the abyss also gazes into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche
The rightful owner of this Ciddie can kiss my arse! :P
As a European, the site is just what I expected!Originally Posted by HIK248
An image of the imperial army on the main page, a link to the "Jewish Team" as they refer to it, soaked in references of their obligation to the state of Israel (a higher priority than the well-being of America apparently), a photo album of the President with prominent Jews, slandering of the main opposition, the hypocracy of the title of "building a safer world" and talks of compassion and religion while currently engaging a genocidal and imperial rampage that the anti-Christ would be delighted to watch, then there's the donation requests...And also the absurd article title of "America's Small Business Supports President Bush".
Are these guys for real...? The Kerry website is probably the same load of dung. Bush is an insult to Christianity as Sharon is to Judaism. It's a pity they hold such high offices.
Pretty much. As I said before, neither candidate is all that exciting. Both Republicans and Democrats have their bad characteristics. The U.K and Canada should let us borrow some of their parties so we can shake things up a bit over here.Are these guys for real...? The Kerry website is probably the same load of dung.
"We need more JFK"
I like Bush but i think there should be more Ronald Reagan.
Turk you live in the US at the momment, right?Originally Posted by Turk
Actually my previous post was a bit misleading,I am not interested so much in the context of the site but in its acces.I have heard that the site can not be accesed from Europe and perhaps from other countries,but only from the US.I live in Greece and i get "acces denied' when i try,that is why I asked for European and non US members for opinions,to see if they can acces it.
But for a certainty back then
We loved so many,yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Ahh, so that's what's wrong with it. But I live in Israel, so a nice O_o at that.have heard that the site can not be accesed from Europe and perhaps from other countries,but only from the US.
Edit: *Laughs*
||
\/
:rolleyes:As a European, the site is just what I expected!
When fighting monsters, be wary not to become one yourself... when gazing into the abyss, bear in mind that the abyss also gazes into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche
The rightful owner of this Ciddie can kiss my arse! :P
I can't remember what it was like with Ronald Reagan since I was a little kid at the time, but at this point really, I'd probably vote for any of our old presidents over Bush. Really, the only president in the US history that I can think of that I feel has done anywhere near as much damage as Bush has is John Adams, and I only say that because if I recall correctly, he was a founding member of the original political parties, something which has plagued our system for two centuries, and broke the electoral college less than a decade after the constitution was written. Of everything that is wrong with out government, a fair amount of which has happened or gotten worse under Bush, one of the worst offenders, one of the broken shards most hurting america, is the political party system we've got set up.Originally Posted by wakka
Seriously, I'd love to see another John Kennedy or Franklin Roosevelt run. If the history books are anywhere near on target in describing them, they were both visionary men, and would do the country good right now.
Sig under construction.
I was born in the US then moved to Istanbul about a year old, then back to the US few months ago.Originally Posted by War Angel
"War Angel"
You consistantly take my statements for laughs and as of late tend to mock them with "alien connections", and now you bring the smiley faces too I see. Very typical for someone who has nothing he can refute.
For some reason after reading for about 2 minutes on that site I couldn't stop laughing.Originally Posted by HIK248
Anyway, I hate Bush. I want him to die and go to hell so Satan can anally rape him every morning after breakfast.
If Kerry doesn't win I think I'll break down and cry. Then again with how the last election went I don't expect Kerry to win, seeing as we don't get to decide anymore.![]()
I like Kung-Fu.
Sorry, you're right. America and the Jews want to conquer and rule the world. I agree.You consistantly take my statements for laughs and as of late tend to mock them with "alien connections", and now you bring the smiley faces too I see. Very typical for someone who has nothing he can refute.
When fighting monsters, be wary not to become one yourself... when gazing into the abyss, bear in mind that the abyss also gazes into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche
The rightful owner of this Ciddie can kiss my arse! :P
WHOAOMG!...er, wait, so 54 percent is a landslide?Kerry would win by a landslide if the world voted...Fifty-four per cent of Australian voters would prefer to see John Kerry in the White House - a figure that exactly matches the average of the 10 surveys.
To answer the actual thread question, I'm willing to guess that a large percentage of people in Europe/Australia/Asia (they ignored Africa and South America in this survey, didn't they?) dislike Bush because of 2 things:
1 - it's the popular thing to do, just as it's the popular thing to do here in the northeast US. People are sheep, after all.
2 - They have not researched anything about Bush's stances on their own. They rely on their media and word of mouth. Again, people are sheep.
It's no secret that I'm voting for Bush. I decided that about two weeks ago, actually. I finally did all of my research on both candidates, and the short reason I'm voting for him is "he's not Kerry," and the longer reason is that I listened to the debates and researched issues that mattered to me, and Bush's stances on those issues agree MUCH more with my own than Kerry's.
Just to address one more comment,
You know that NINETY-NINE out of 100 senators voted for the Patriot act, right? Included in that set of 99 is John Kerry.I do believe the case is extremely dangerous now for the US, mainly because the Bush administration is full of fascists, and yes, when I say fascist I mean that nearly literally, and I mean "nearly" because at least fascism is more obviously repressive, while the current administration is nicely repressive (with things such as the PATRIOT act).
I wasn't aware of that.....Originally Posted by MartyM
.
Originally Posted by Adam Sandler
I like Kung-Fu.
Both Bush and Kerry are less than ideal presidential candidates. It's a choice of the lesser of two evils in this election. Do I want to stub my toe, or hit my thumb with a hammer? Honestly, both will prove to be a highly similar, and highly unpleasant experience. No matter who wins, we'll all be jumping up and down shouting God darn it! I think Bush is the lesser of two evils.
Knock yourselves down.
Most of whom later admitted that they had not read it when they voted for it. That's a horrible thing for them to do, but it doesn't change the fact that there's a good chance he didn't know what he was voting for when he did.Originally Posted by MartyM
And explain to me how this absolves the Bush administration from introducing it in the first place? Granted, I haven't done much study on what laws throughout US history have been thrown out as unconstitutional, but the act appears to be perhaps one of the most unconstitutional laws ever passed. I've flipped through the text of the bill (which is really the best you can do if you're not proficient with legalese) and from what I could see, the only part of it that seems to not be unconstitutional is the part that says that the FBI and CIA need to do a better job at sharing information.
This truly is an election of trying to decide who will do the least damage to our country. If this election doesn't unequivocally prove that there's something seriously wrong with the two party system, I don't know what will. With Bush, there's probably better than even odds things will get worse, whereas Kerry is an unknown. And in this case, I'll go with the unknown factor than the damn-near-sure loss.
That may be, but Bush as well has shown that what he says about an issue and what he does about them are often two different things, as shown in post #8 of this thread.Originally Posted by MartyM
Last edited by Super Christ; 10-29-2004 at 01:36 PM.
Sig under construction.